Which integrated amp for better musicality - Parasound Hint vs Primaluna vs ???


I've been having a blast looking up threads and doing some research but my dilemma is this - I want to get more enjoyment out of my music (don't we all). My Anthem and Oppo setup honestly sound great but I can't help but think that maybe I am missing out. I am thinking of upgrading some of my gear by either adding an integrated amp or separates. I'd love to hear some recommendations. Based on some reading, I am considering: 

1. Parasound Halo Integrated 6
2. Primaluna Dialogue Premium or Premium HP

My current setup is as follows: 

Oppo 105D
Anthem MRX 510 AVR
Ascend Acoustic Sierra RAAL Towers and Horizon Center

Any recommendations or thoughts would be greatly appreciated. 
freesole

Showing 3 responses by soundermn

 I have been very happy with my Primaluna.  I have the HP and have had it for about two years.  It's fantastic.  Before that I had a Dialogue One for four years.  I was driving B&W 803s with the HP, and it worked very well, even given that they can be hard to drive.

One thought... you may not need the HP.  The Dialogue Premium has tons of power too, and while I haven't evaluated them side by side, I've heard that the Premium may be just slightly better with finesse than the HP.  I think you'd be happy with either.  Keep in mind the Premium has 4 fewer tubes to buy when you want to upgrade to the KT150s.  Because you will!  :-)

Sorry my post appeared multiple times.  I had some odd glitch with AGon.  

Are the KT150s a must?  No.  The stock EL34s are really nice.  They have the wonderful midrange, and even the highs and lows are pretty nice.  I had KT120s for a while, and they are pretty nice too, but they have an upper midrange glare that I didn't like.  They added more powerful bass and crisp highs.  The KT150s are the perfect balance between those tubes, and there is no hint of that KT120 glare.  Is it a must?  No.  But, you know you will eventually try them!  :-)

The idea that I could run out of power with the Premium is why I went with the HP.  It has plenty of power, and I'm convinced the Premium would too.  I don't have the sense of it running out of power, or "saturate" unless it's really loud, and I'd say it definitely has "slam".  We rock out to it all the time.  

Of your other choices, the only one I know is the Rogue.  I think that it's good, but not in the same league with the PL.  Build quality is good, but PL is excellent.  The Rogue has a nice sound, but I find it a little edgy or glarey at times, at least by comparison.  The PL sounds more refined to me, and I think it will last much longer without issues.  

The Line Magnetic is one I'd like to check out.  I have heard good things, and based on what I've read, i think it would be very close in performance to the PL... meaning better or worse by only a small margin.  I wouldn't buy the ARC because they seem to be finicky with tubes and settings, and if a tube goes south, your amp may have to go back to Plymouth, MN for repair.  That seems to be a common problem, although they sound fantastic, based on demos I have heard at the dealer.

When I was deciding what to buy, I noticed that PL is rarely for sale used.  Right now, there are 6 Rogue amps for sale right here for half of retail, but only one PL set (Preamp and amp), listed at about 65% of retail.  I figured that people who buy them keep them, plus they retain their value - and that's part of the reason I picked PL.
An observation on the Line Magnetics... they seem to deliver a lot of power.  For example the LM=150iA is rated for 100 wpc with 2x KT150 per channel. This is driving the tubes a lot harder than the Primaluna.  It may sound wonderful, even better than the PL.  But, I am thinking it may be harder on tubes, thus requiring more frequent replacement of tubes.  

The PL delivers 96 wpc with 4x KT150 per channel, so it is driving the tubes at a lower level.  Theoretically this would extend tube life.

Just an observation.