2. misc-audio
  3. 1236524319

Please disclose your commercial affiliation

I am not going to mention names or products, but I think most Audiogoneers have read a number of product reviews or threads and have wondered if the writer is one way or the other commercially associated with that product.

I number of folks do sometimes do push a product so hard or vehemently defend any negative comments about a particular product in way that actually revels their affiliation.

Insiders, you know who you are.

Would you agree that if you are associated with a product, it is fair to the community to disclose your affiliation
ajackson1
macrojack
1,292 posts
 
Thank you, Mr. Tennis.
tvad
9,467 posts
 
I reject the notion of dismissing opinions.

Enough positive or negative opinions about a given component can provide a good indication that the item should be investigated further or dismissed, especially if the opinion(s) is from someone whose preferences coincide with your own.

This is independent of dealers or manufacturers who have reason to financially benefit by recommending equipment they sell or build, which as far as I can tell is the original premise of this thread.
mrtennis
3,295 posts
 
an intelligent person will not rely on the opinions of strangers. regardless of the motivation, it is useful to use your own judgment and ears.

perception of sound is unique, as well as preferences. the use of terms is not precise. it is unlikely that another person will be so similiar in regard to all of the relevant parameters that are of concern to hobbyists that reliance on other persons' judgment can eliminate significant risk.
audiofeil
4,011 posts
 
>>03-09-09: Mrtennis
you're a genius. if i stated what you stated, i would be villified<<

He doesn't display your pomposity, inflexibility, and arrogance.
tvad
9,467 posts
 
MrT, using opinion as a starting point to choose to investigate something further is not the same as relying on the opinion of others to make a decision. I have never advocated the latter.
More to discover