Linn Classik versus Linn Majik

i can't help you regarding the sonics here, but i *can* say i'd be hesitant to buy any amp/pre/tuner that had a cd-player built-in. the rate of advancement is just so great w/digital that the piece will be obsolete in no time - you'll want to either hook another cd-player into it, or sell it...

ymmv, doug s.

Pretty tough decision. I started with Genki/Majik combo and then downgraded to the Classik because the sonic differences were less important to me. (I started with Tukans and now have Ninkas.)

Many people are surprised at how good the Classik's CD player sounds. And it doesn't help that (to my ears) the genki sound is much closer the classik than to the superior Ikemi, my favorite player.

I have heard that Katan + Sizmik is pretty tough to beat (with katans alone not much better than the Tukans alone.)

It might make more sense to think in terms of your upgrade options. With option #1, if will be difficult to change the components. But your speakes will be sufficient for a long time. A "set it and forget it" approach.

With #2, you could change one thing at a time. The Tukans are great speakers, and will keep you happy for a while, but they may need a sub at some point. This would work better for "tweakers" and "constant upgraders."

Keep in mind that both systems are very well matched right now and will probably sound equally good.

Thanks. I ended up going with the Majik plus Tukans, and have added an LK 85 so that I can biamp and at a later date go Avtiv.

By the way, is there a sub you'd recommend other than the Sizmik (which is a little pricy).

kdl, if ya search the archives here, you'll find many subwoofer threads, expressing my opinions, & those of others. here's one of the most recent:

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?cspkr&1009998767&openusid&zzSedond&4&&

doug s.