Pass X-250 or McCormack DNA-2 Deluxe

I have been using Pass pre-amplification (X-1 and X-ONO) and have loved the combination, so I can't say anything bad about Pass Labs. The entire X-series has received pretty much universal applause. But if you are looking for bass slam and mucho dynamics, I don't think you can do any better than the McCormack. My DNA-225 has power reserves out of this world, belying the 225 power rating. The DNA-2 is even more of the same.

Neither amp, that you are considering, is particularily known for its airness and sweetness. Detail and power sure. The DNA-125 and DNA-225 were steps toward sweetness with detail. And the new Pass Labs XA-250 is promised to be even more of the same.

I hate to say it but your best bet may be listening to both before committing. Even though I don't think you can go wrong with either. One question though: How much power do you really need? A used DNA-125 would cost you even less as would one of the earlier Pass Labs Alepha series.

Best of luck,

Thomas Gonzales
Chicago, IL

I'm just wondering how you narrowed it down to these two, if you haven't heard either one? Thomas is correct about auditioning before buying if you can, and I don't hate to say it. :-)

arn't we talking about two different price levels?
i would add plinius sa250 in that list which is superior to them both.

if you can't stretch to plinius SA250 you can get SA100 which will bring you everything you've just stated into your speakers.

The Conrad Johnson MF2500 will also provide the qualities you seek and it works great with tube pre-amps. However, you really should try to audition if possible before you buy.