New H20 Signature S250

I gather that the big selling point for the H2O amp is its analog power supply, capable of supplying lots of current for a long time. However, it is not obvious to me why this is important. Since we are powering a digital amp that has high efficiency the delivery of high amperage would be directly into the speaker, which would get fried! It would seem to me that a relatively small power supply with fast recovery would do the job just fine.

Tell me why this is incorrect.

There is one other, that I can think of, ICE amp with an analog power supply. That would be the bigger eAR amps. They have a relatively small one. All the other ICE amp builders use the digital ASP modules. Size counts. With the smaller analog supply, it doesn't exude body, like the H2O.

I have never heard of someone burning out a speaker with more than sufficient current.

Jeff: great "mini" review. I too, have had the pleasure of hearing Larry's system a couple times. Last time was prior to his Sound Lab "extreme make-over", so I can only imagine how good they sound now!

OK..., I have heard the H2o, and mostly agree it is quite an amp -- especially for the price (and also owned JC-1's for about a year), but has anyone seen, or more importantly heard, the Red Dragon ICE module amp? Listed here @ 'Gon for around $1700, and the guy's confident enought to let you audition for 45 DAYS, and wll pay the shipping BOTH WAYS. Interesting, eh?

Denf...When I made inquiry about the eAR amp I got an EMail from Red Dragon suggesting that I consider their unit. It appears to be virtually identical to the eAR 1000 watt amp, without the hassle of overseas shipment. Red Dragon is supposedly working on a multichannel version that I could configure for three channels, which is what I want.

Eldartford, like you, I believe the future of ICE and other digital amps lies in multi-channel applications. What a benefit to have crystal clear sound for 5,6 or 7 channels in an inexpensive and lightweight single box? Frankly, I'd be surprised if commercial theaters don't jump on this.

We two channel lovers will forever debate the attributes of digital vs. ss vs. tubes, but the multi-channel market seems to be wide open because listeners are less critical (no perjorative connotation intended). I mean how many viewers of "Die Hard" care about the "naturalness" of Bruce Willis' footfall on road gravel?