Good speakers less efficient?

Shadorne says.... "Does this imply that there is fundamentally a SPL sweetspot for particular forms of music that is independent of the speaker used?"

Of course. Just yesterday I listened to my CD of Kings College Chior Christmas Carols, and with all those voices, and the organ thundering away, I got to thinking about why I have six large subwoofer drivers. No way that music would sound right coming out of a 6 inch bookshelf speaker. On the other hand, I have violin recordings that must the played at a much lower SPL. A real violin can play only so loud, and if you crank it up louder than that it sounds lousy.

I agree with Eldartford above in that I noticed there seems to be a level on a number of recordings that seem to "come to life" at a given point and then as it gets louder, the magic tends to go away.

On some recordings there are multiple "magic" SPL points (and I noticed that in a number of cases the other magic points seem to be a multiple of 3 db, give or take, from the initial magic point - go figure).

Sensitivity is the proper term. There's no correlation between high sensitivity and low sensitivity as it relates to quality. Only the speaker designers idea of what works best.

You'll also note most speakers are 86 to 92db sensitive. I'd guess that may cover 90%.

Wait until you count to ten before you throw rocks at me. Klipschorns are the most efficient speakers on the market with a sensitivity of 105 dB, and one of the best sounding speakers as well once modifications have been made. Modifications needed are replacement of the Klipsch crossovers with ALK extreme slope crossovers, replacement of the midrange horn with Martinelli wooden horns, and the replacement of the Klipsch tweeter with the Beyma CP25 tweeter... nine, ten. OK I'm at a safe distance. Hit me if you can.