2. speakers
  3. 1216077997

dynamic range -the good and bad?

so dynamic range in a given recording is limited by many factors,correct? And I have read many many threads that make dynamic range sound very ideal, correct? ok, that said, I thought I had a decent surround sys setup, marantz reciever and enegry take speakers. Assumed I had good dynamic range, and maybe I do. But I just set up my new 2 channel (extremly modest) system. Threw is some classical and now I notice something I havent before. The soft passages are queit so i turn it up and the louder passages are to loud!!! Is this normal? Guess it could be my room, the cd, or equipment but is this a common problem?
glowplug
glowplug OP
37 posts
 
Ive got a remastered version of kind of blue, on some of the tracks when the horns get really loud and going, they break up, same in my car, through my ss sys, aand my portable with grados! sounds like i need a new version!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
gregm
3,021 posts
 
The soft passages are queit so i turn it up and the louder passages are to loud!!! ...is this a common problem?
Unless you're joking (which is fine), this is what's called wide "dynamic range"; i.e. the distance between the quiet and the loud passages.

That's a solution -- not a problem! That's what music is like: sometimes loud sometimes not.
pacific_island_audio
49 posts
 
To my knowledge there isn't a single classical recording that has been compressed. That's why classical CDs or LPs usually require the volume knob to be turned up so you can hear the very soft parts, and then, the very loud parts really hit you, just like in a concert hall. Recording standards are much higher for classical—the music, musicians, and listeners demand it.
jdoris
852 posts
 
Slightly off the main topic: Whats the best issue of Kind of Blue on CD?

John
shadorne's avatar
Ag insider logo xs@2x
shadorne
7,333 posts
 
Dynamic range is GOOD.

The death of dynamic range on modern recordings has made audiophiles an endangered species...
More to discover