You got some of it right. There are 2 design approaches, and your ideas are combining both of them which is not a good idea (costs lots of $$$ down the drain).
Take a look at http://www.atma-sphere.com/papers/paradigm_paper2.html
Anytime that devices from the two paradigms are combined, it will result in a tonality problem- too much highs, not enough highs, too much bass, not enough bass, etc. You need to stick to one paradigm or the other. IMO the Voltage paradigm is used to get good specs on paper, the Power Paradigm is intended to match the Rules of Human Hearing with no regard for bench tests (which these days uses the Voltage paradigm rules).
You would think that the bench tests would be testing for the things that are important to the human ear but this is most certainly not the case!
Take a look at http://www.atma-sphere.com/papers/paradigm_paper2.html
Anytime that devices from the two paradigms are combined, it will result in a tonality problem- too much highs, not enough highs, too much bass, not enough bass, etc. You need to stick to one paradigm or the other. IMO the Voltage paradigm is used to get good specs on paper, the Power Paradigm is intended to match the Rules of Human Hearing with no regard for bench tests (which these days uses the Voltage paradigm rules).
You would think that the bench tests would be testing for the things that are important to the human ear but this is most certainly not the case!