The DAC
Which matters more, DAC or transport?
In my search to better the digital playback of my system I've been lead to look at several DACs to couple with my arcam cd36, and have also considered buying a whole new player like a McIntosh mcd 201 or maybe even a lower end esoteric. My question is: will I get better results using a good DAC (for $2000 to $3000) with my mid-fi transport or with a new player that has a better transport mechanism built in, coupled with what's probably a slightly less sophisticated onboard DAC? Also, what do people think of the Bel Canto DAC3? It's one I've considered. Thanks.
- ...
- 26 posts total
having owned and demo'd a good portion of what's available on the market. What they do is offer the most natural tonality within the most complete harmonic envelope I have ever experienced. You may think your system has no stridency, but when you put the Morrows in you will remove every last bit of... Oh Groovy Baby |
The answer isn't one or the other. It's too dependent on how the connection between the two is implemented. A cheap transport and a cheap DAC with a well implemented I²S connection may sound better than their expensive counterparts with a optical TOSLINK connector. In direct answer to the poster's equipment choices -- I think you're more likely to get better sound with a new CD player. |
The easy way is to just buy an integrated player. If the Arcam is an older device, it is probably possible to improve on it in all regards with newer models at modest cost, like a Rega or Cambridge Audio player, say. If it is newer, then it might be worth trying the DAC first and then changing transport later but only if needed. GOing the DAC route will also open up the option of using a music server if interested, which is really something worth considering for the future. PErsonally, I'd think twice before dumping a lot of money into a high end integrated CD player these days. |
- 26 posts total