Neutral electronics are a farce...

I have moved the above comment over to "Has anyone heard..." thread.

Sheesh are things really so dire? My stuff sounds great. Maybe on the bleeding edge.....

One thing never changes....worry about the things that matter that you can control, not those that do not as much and you can’t.

Obsessive compulsive audiophiles are fine. Someone has to worry about the outstanding details in a lab environment before something is ready for mass consumption.

Its just not me though.   I spend my time listening and enjoying the music whenever I can.

I’m an east coaster and usually try to get to Capital Audiofest each summer. Always some nice finds there.

I think it is a matter of how stable and how focused compared to live.

I recommend that you get a set of really good microphones (I use Neumann U-67s) and go out and make your own recordings. That's what I do (Canto General, which was produced on LP and CD, is one of my first reference disks, produced in 1986). Having been there at the recording site and having heard what the microphone feed did (and having heard many microphone feeds before and since), I can instantly if something is right or not. Having your own reference is really handy; how else are you to know if a recording is really sounding right?

Stable and focused is no worries.

I guess you can compare the difference between a photo taken with a 3 MP camera, a 5 MP camera etc.

What if you take a picture now with a 100 mega pixel camera?
They are all stable and focused but now you can see detail that only could have be seen in person.

My auto-focus uses quantum physics and is accurate to parts per trillion.
Semiconductor manufacturers do not make a device that can do this.
That's why I had to make my own devices.

Roger

The analogy does not hold up.

Do you have a method of measuring the effect you describe?