2. speakers
  3. 123796-373

Why are most speakers designed for robots?

I recently decided to get a used pair of speakers as part of a trade deal and to my amazement, they have performed far better than any of my previous Wilson's, B&W's or Dynaudio speakers.  They are Krell Resolution 2 speakers (my system IS all Krell).  They are just far more realistic tonally, crazy dynamic and have a full sounding warm mid-band.  Bass is crushing with oodles of texture and pitch definition.  Obviously designed for humans who listen to music NOT played back in an anechonic chamber.  It is shocking to me how bad so many high end speakers sound to my ear...all precision and no life, like a robot!
128x128dave_b
dave_b's avatar
dave_b OP
2,267 posts
 
Certainly some merit to Synergy being a factor, but I have owned many speakers with a lot of various gear.  The Wilson WP 6's and Totem speakers offer the kind of exceptional experience I referred to in my post.  It's just that the Res 2's just seem to have that special balance of musicality and high definition that makes everything sound alive and vibrant!
Post removed 
dave_b's avatar
dave_b OP
2,267 posts
 
That's it scott_w....feel like I finally nailed the Audio Nexus, where my analytical brain is satisfied enough to let the rest of my brain be absorbed by the music.  I can really feel like I'm with the musicians in the same space...reinvigorates me and relaxes me at the same time!!
skoczylas's avatar
skoczylas
218 posts
 
Totally agree with Dave. In the sound vs music spectrum I'm on the music side. Wilsons and other hyper precise gear make detailed sound, require space age set up and only sound good with certain recordings. I am in this game to hear great music - even, gasp, on sub optimal recordings. 
dave_b's avatar
dave_b OP
2,267 posts
 
Exactly skoczylas...I have thousands of CD's and not all are audiophile approved.  I am amazed how much detail and air I can get out of the Krell's, just without crossing the line into hyper detailed.
More to discover