Anybody else using a distributed array sub system?


     I was just about to respond to zardozmike's forum post titled 'subwoofers' about suggestions for subs for Magnepan MGIII speakers but decided a new post might be more useful for him and others.  I have Magnepan 2.7QR speakers and posted a similar question about a year ago.  After reading his thread, I realized he was getting about the same responses I had received.  All were very good responses but I thought a new thread detailing my effective solution may be more relevant and attract responses from other users of a distributed array sub system.    


     About a year ago I purchased the Audio Kinesis DEBRA (Distributed-Eq Bass Reflex Array) sub system from James Romeyn Music and Audio in Utah. Here's a link describing the system:


http://jamesromeyn.com/old-pages/home-audio-gear/dsa-1-0-distributed-subwoofer-array-5-pieces-4k-usd...

 

       This system is expensive at $2,990 but well worth the investment.  I rationalized the price by noting it's about the same as a pair of very good regular subs.


     The performance of this system in my 23' x 14' living room is excellent.  The bass can be fast, tight and tuneful for music or loud and impactful for music and home theater.  The subs seem to disappear since there are no audible clues to their locations; the bass is very well integrated into the music and movies. From my personal experience, I'm not convinced of the reality of stereo bass but was willing to give it a try.    I was originally thinking of buying 2 high quality subs such as Rhythmik, SVS, JL, Martin/Logan, Vandersteen or REL.  I was skeptical of the DEBRA system at first but, after reading a lot of research about multiple sub systems on the internet, I decided to give it a try and I'm now very thankful that I did. 


     Because it is such an ideal system for me, and because I think it would work well in almost any room or system, I want to go into more detail about the system, its setup and the theory behind it. I have no affiliation with the company but will admit, after considerable phone and email time with the dealer, that I now consider James Romeyn a friend of mine but don't know if he feels likewise.

     The system consists of the following:

A dedicated Dayton Audio mono class A/B amp rated at 950 watts @ 4 ohms with dual A&B spkr output terminals.

4 67lb. bass-reflex  subs that measure a relatively small 23.75" H x 14.5" W x 10.375" D.

Each sub is ported on the bottom, supported by 3 spiked cones and contains a single 10" 4 ohm driver. The subs are designed to be facing, and within 2" of, the room walls.

     The setup procedure is:

Sub#1 is hooked up and placed on its back  (driver facing the ceiling) at the normal listening position.  Music is played that has good and repetitive bass.

Walk around the edges of the room and determine exactly where the bass sounds best to you.

Attach the 3 spiked footers to Sub#1 and position it upright facing the nearest wall to the spot you determined the bass sounded best.

Sub#2 is hooked up and placed on its back at the primary listening position. With sub 1 & 2 playing, continue walking around the edges of your room and determine again where the bass sounds best to you.

Attach the 3 spiked footers to Sub#2 and position it upright facing the nearest wall to the spot you determined the bass sounded best.

Repeat this procedure for sub 3 & 4.

Small positioning adjustments may need to be made for each sub due to avoiding furniture and the WAF. 

Once completed, final sub hook up is done in parallel:

Attach a single wire from the amp's speaker A's pos. output terminal and to Sub#1's pos. input terminal.

Attach a single wire from the amp's speaker A's neg. output terminal and to Sub#2's neg. input terminal.

Attach a single wire from Sub#1's neg. input terminal to Sub#2's pos. input terminal.

Attach Sub 3 & 4 using this parallel method on the amp's speaker B's output terminals.

I ordered single, high quality and low gauge speaker wire along with the sub system for a very reasonable price. Once the ideal locations for the subs was determined, I drilled holes in my room's floor to the crawl space below, and was able to hide the connecting wires. 

     I'm definitely not an expert on subs or room acoustics but, from my reading, here is how I understand the theory behind the distributed array sub systems:


The lower the frequency the longer the sound wave produced, or launched,  into a room. 

Since these waves can be even longer than the actual dimensions in many rooms, these low frequency waves bounce off room surfaces and the music may dictate subsequent bass waves being launched into this acoustic environment. These initial waves, their reflections and subsequent bass waves inevitably collide and cause 'standing waves'.

Areas in the room where sound waves meet can make the bass sound under emphasized, over emphasized or even totally missing (nulls caused by wave cancelation).

When one sub is launching low frequency waves from 1 specific location, areas in a specific room where bass response is not accurate will be numerous and predictable based on sub location and room dimensions.

Adding a 2nd sub to the room will decrease standing waves and increase bass accuracy and bass dispersion.

According to scientific studies I read, standing waves are reduced, and bass accuracy and dispersion increased, as more subs are used in a given room.  Their experiments utilized more subs than anyone would even consider for home use. They basically concluded that the more subs in a room, the fewer standing waves are perceived and the better the bass quality and bass dispersion results.

However, they determined that most of the benefits are gained with the use of 4 subs, with only minimal and incremental gains in performance attained through additional subs.  Due to practical room considerations, the researchers recommended 4 subs for an effective distributed array bass system.


     So that's the equipment, set-up and the theory behind the DEBRA system and I can personally attest to its effectiveness in my room.  I have 6 listening/viewing positions in my combination music and ht system in my living room.  Bass response is equally good at all 6 positions without the use of acoustic devices (no absorbing or diffusing panels or bass traps) and without any electronic  equalization (room analysis/correction equipment, software or eq).  I should mention I've never had my system/room analyzed using a mike and software.  From my purely subjective perspective, however, I'm confident the results would be good since I spent hours on the setup and critical listening from all six listening positions in my room.  I would suggest this type of sub system as a viable alternative for anyone considering investing in one or more quality subs.  The system is rated clean at 113 decibels at 20 hz.  I've often heard and felt it go much lower.  It feels and sounds clean and right but I can't verify the decibels or lack of distortion.


Sorry this turned out so long and windy,

  Tim

Also, my system photos are old but I'll try to update them showing my current system (with the subs and new electronics) soon.



     


  

128x128noble100
Johnnyb53,

      You wrote:
" Or, for $2800 you can let the Audiokinesis Swarm 4-sub system do the heavy lifting".
Absolute Sound review.
http://www.audiokinesis.com/the-swarm-subwoofer-system-1.html.


     I read the entire Absolute Sound review on the Swarm sub system you referenced and that is almost exactly like my James Romeyn Audio Debra system.  The sub modules look identical except mine are in birch.  The only differences I could discern are  the weight of each sub and the system price.   The Swarm lists theirs as 45 lbs/each but my Debra subs are listed as 67 lbs/each.  I paid $2,990 for the Debra and the Swarm is listed at $2,800.  There were no pictures of the Swarm's amp but the description matches the Debra's amp exactly.

     The setup procedure described in the review is also identical, even down to the option to invert the phase on 1 sub module ( mine are all currently in phase since I haven't  tried  inverting 1 sub's phase yet to see if it improves performance)..

     The reviewer's description of the sound is also the same: very smooth, tuneful and natural bass throughout the room with an absence of peaks and nulls.  

     I know James Romeyn  and Duke Lejeune, of Audio Kinesis, have been collaborating together for some time, with a distributed array bass system being one of the results.  I'm actually not sure why they each have their own versions of a distributed array bass system,especially since they're so similar.

      I'm going to call James and try to get some more information.  I'll post again after I know more.

Tim  

     
pryso,

     You wrote:

" Hi Tim,

I'm a bit confused.  Is the DEBRA designed by/built for Romeyn and is similar to the Audiokinesis Swarm, or is it an additional Audiokinesis product sold by Romeyn?

Your first link from Romeyn's site does not identify the author so I assume it relates his perspective."

     I'm a bit confused, myself.  Hopefully James Romeyn can clarify and I'll post again after he replies.  I prefer not to speculate for accuracy's sake.

Thanks,
  Tim
My intention in posting in this thread is to clarify, answer questions, and to avoid, as much as possible, soliciting kind members and any obvious sales pitch. If I fail, please let me know and if possible I'll delete and/or append  offensive text.


To my best knowledge, it's appropriate to credit three persons for inventing the multiple or distributed sub array: Dr. Floyd Toole, Dr. Earl Geddes, and Todd Welti. Duke LeJeune is an early adopter, studied w/patent holder Dr. Earl Geddes, and Duke introduced me to Distributed Sub Array. 

Duke adds a unique feature to his DSA (called Swarm): "Small" or "Domestic" size rooms (as opposed to commercial size rooms), naturally boost bass about 3 dB per octave <100 Hz. To counter or neutralize this effect, Duke naturally tuned his subs for a mirror image of this curve, w/acoustic roll off of about 3 dB per octave <100 Hz, or about -7 dB @ 20 Hz.

All comments Re. performance apply to a properly designed and well-setup distributed array.

DSA has no perceived nor mathematical disadvantage for 2-ch music. I've read much though not all of Toole's writings on the subject. AFAIK Toole has written nothing suggesting a weakness for DSA in 2-ch application. Properly designed and installed, transition to any main speakers, regardless the architecture, is absolutely seamless and transparent. DSA improves spatial performance in every way, and has no downside except cost, hookup wire, and possibly larger foot print (only about 11-3/4” x 14-3/4”).  

Single amp crossover pole should be 80-90 Hz maximum. If a second amp is used, crossover pole may increase to about 150 Hz. In this case, the two subs closest to the front wall cross higher, while the two subs closest to the rear wall cross in the range of 70-80 Hz maximum.

I typed a text document about 1.3 pages, comparing DSA to four spinning propellers in a fish tank aquarium. Upon request I'll post it at my DEBRA web page.

Re. the “solvency” issue mentioned above relative to my one time selling Thorell guitars and not selling them now. I enjoyed selling the few Thorell guitars I did, and by mutual agreement with Ryan, decided to concentrate on my professional “wheel house,” being music and audio.  (Downbeat Magazine reviewed my personal Thorell Sweet E guitar, which I latter sold.  Some time latter, another client offered to buy the exact same guitar for a lot more than what he paid.  When I asked the first buyer if he was interested in splitting the profit margin, he refused.)


Duke licenses me to sell DEBRA, which functions identical to Swarm. Differences: DEBRA cabinets are about 1.75” wider and 1.75” less deep. Also, for $2990/five pieces (four subs + kilowatt amp), DEBRA cabinets include a 3/4” solid wood top panel w/round over on all four corners (under the solid wood crown is 3/4” MDF veneered both sides).  Also, my prices include maple, cherry, walnut, or satin black, whereas I believe Swarm costs extra for black (images to be posted soon of current production cabinets).


For $2800/set, subtract the solid wood crown w/round over, and all corners are square 90 degree.


Another difference is that all four DEBRA subs have only one pair of binding posts, while two of the Swarm subs have two pairs of binding posts and the remaining two subs have one pair of posts.


I credit Bob Carver w/giving me the idea for my setup advice, which has proven to work very well in a large variety of rooms. Without EQ of any kind, the worst case I have seen in any room is +/- 2 dB <100 Hz throughout the room, w/only minor “build up” in the most extreme corners. When one sub is ideally located in my current room, the FR window is 13 dB at the sweet spot, and extreme “hot spots” throughout the room.


Circa 2015, prices increased for the 10” ultra low bass driver. For the increased cost, cutoff now extends to 18 Hz.


Changes in cabinet construction circa 2015: Noble100's enclosures are 5/8” old growth Russian Baltic Birch ply laminated over 5/8” particle board for damping quality via its random shapes and sizes of wood chips. We switched to Duke's old cabinet maker (Duke moved from just north of me in ID to TX). Current cabinets are 3/4” MDF veneered both sides, with double thick baffle (1.5”) under the 10” driver, with a full “picture frame” brace just above the 10” driver. Recently we auditioned with 115+ dB peaks and no one including myself noticed any audible distress of any kind, in my 3300cf room.


Classic setup advice for one or two subs: distance between two subs and/or from any sub to the farthest main speaker should not exceed one quarter wavelength of the crossover pole. Conversely, with DSA, there is no “proximity effect” crossed @ 80 Hz, even with about 25 feet between two subs close to diagonal corners.


Strangely enough, as much as bass modes distort pitch, non-linear time distortion may be even worse and more audible. Bass modes can cause a particular bass note to linger or continue bouncing between boundaries long after the bass player on the program muted the note and played the next note of a different pitch. Listeners can and often do hear the two disharmonious notes playing simultaneously, where should be only one proper note.


Once listeners hear the difference of a system lacking this type of distortion, it's hard if not impossible to go back.


My last sound room had the equivalent of about $7k in acoustic upgrades and structural modifications, including a 3-sided acoustic ceiling soffit, w/mixed results at best. I paid $750 for the acoustic design alone. By huge margin the DSA outperformed the mods in that room.


       I talked to James Romeyn this afternoon and here's how he described the differences between his Debra and the Audio Kinesis Swarm bass systems:

They're basically the same systems and perform about the same.  James' company sells the Debra system under a licensing agreement with Audio Kinesis.

The Debra subs are a little wider and a little less deep than the Swarm subs.  His cabinets are made at a different facility than the Swarm's cabinets.  Both are constructed using braced MDF particle boards but the Debra's cabinets use a solid piece of wood  for the tops.

He didn't think the sub weight difference between the two (67lbs vs 45lbs) is accurate He thinks the Debra subs weigh less than 67 lbs. and the Swarm subs weigh more; he wasn't certain of the exact figures.

He thinks the difference in system price (Debra at $2,990 and Swarm at $2,800) is due to the differences in the cost of sub construction.. He said he'd probably price match if requested.

He also told me some interesting related information:

He said each room has a unique modal response, similar to a fingerprint, that is based on the configuration and dimensions of each room. It is further complicated by the fact that a room's bass modal response is different than the same room's mid-range/treble modal response.  The very long sound waves produced by bass frequencies result in peaks and nulls in different physical room locations than the much shorter sound waves produced by mid-range and treble frequencies.  Because of this, he thinks it's best to treat them as separate systems; a multi-sub bass system that eliminates bass frequency peaks and nulls in the entire room that establishes a solid foundation along with a  mid-range/treble system that consists of a pair of speakers positioned for optimum  performance at the 'sweet spot'.  A distributed array sub system will provide very good bass for all listening positions in a room but providing very good mid-range/treble beyond a single optimum listening position 'sweet spot' is much more difficult.  He also stated that both the Debra and Swarm systems provide good bass for ht and 2-ch music with no detrimental affect on the sound stage. I can verify this is true in my system/room.  In my opinion and if anything, the Debra has improved my 2-ch sound stage illusion for music by making it seem more like live music in my room. 

     He said he'll read this thread and join in if he has something to add to the discussion or wants to clarify.

Tim 
.  




     I wanted to clarify the descriptions of the Debra and Swarm bass systems by adding a couple of quotes from the James Romeyn Audio & Music website  (jamesromeyn.com ):

" Dr. Robert E. Greene is Senior Editor at The Absolute Sound Magazine and Math Professor at UCLA. He also tutored Russell Crowe in the violin for “Master And Commander” and Russell’s Appalachian accent for “A Beautiful Mind”. AudioKinesis Swarm Sub Woofer Array was reviewed by Dr. Greene in TAS Issue 252, April 2015. Swarm won TAS Editor’s Choice Award, their second major journalism award. DEBRA is similar to Swarm, with different cabinet materials, different construction, and different cabinet dimensions (wider and less deep)."

"DEBRA employs four subwoofers each with a high-output reflex-loaded 10″ driver. Duke LeJeune of AudioKinesis specified the drivers, distributed array concept, and special “Room Gain Complementary” tuning. We specified original “Progressive Null Point” siting instructions and cabinet architecture (cosmetics, fasteners, unique bracing, special laminate, and three panel materials to minimize and distribute resonant qualities).

Thanks,
 Tim.