Old Amp vs. New Amp

Thanks for your input.  Honestly I am a little skeptical about class D.  I don't really have a reason to be though.

I believe for the most part the ones I am looking at are class A at least to a certain point.  It's a little hard to tell sometimes.  The specs aren't always very clear about that.

I am kind of leaning towards some of the older Mark Levinson models (300 series mainly).

IMHO, Class D is not yet ready for prime time.

stereo5977 posts02-15-2017 8:14amIMHO, Class D is not yet ready for prime time.

+1
Not until technology advances enough for the switching frequency of Class-D to be at least >5 x higher, then their switching noise output filters can do their job without any detrimental effects on the audio band.

Cheers George

Class D to me feels like one of those things that makes it cheaper, easier and faster to manufacture, but may be lacking in "listening pleasure".  But I have not heard any of the newer "High End" class D offerings.

I know PS Audio Stellar line uses some sort of hybrid of Class D technology.  I would be curious to compare those to other high end products.

Also, some manufacturers like SMc Audio (McCormack), Atma-Sphere (tubes)and Ayre update their older models. So, you wouldn't have to worry about not being able to get either repairs or getting the most up to date version.
Regarding cables, it would simplify a lot if you went with balanced connections which aren't as fussy as RCA. Even an inexpensive cable will give you plenty of dynamics.
Class D amps intrigue me, but it seems the jury is out. Some swear by them, other less so. Though the prices are attractive.
Bob