Tell Us about an Album That Took a Long Time to Grow on You

I'm still not sure I have warmed up to Ummagumma. Maybe in another 50 years it will grow on me? I'm sure there were some albums that were a slow burn but I just can't remember which ones, seriously. Most of the time, I can tell in the first 5 minutes if an album has a chance. I always play them through 3 times just to make sure but usually I know right away.

Having been a perhaps too big a fan for Aqualung it took me a few years to wrap my head around Thick As A Brick by Tull. I was expecting Aqualung Part Two but instead received something that made me re-listen to their entire - back then - catalogue. (Stand Up, Benefit...)

That more or less changed when I heard the record on a decent stereo system not long after it was released. That also more or less started me on high fidelity as well. I am not a purist audiophile in the sense that it's the artist, not the sound reproduction, that grabs one by the short hairs and has an impact. It's not the clubs, Laddie. 

Anyhoo, once I heard Thick As A Brick on a decent stereo I was hooked.  It remains in my rotation to this day, ahead of Aqualung, right along with Revolver, Exile On Main Street, and as an ode to my father, Classical Music Symphonic Orchestra Volume Two or something like that - a series that my mother would pick up at the A&P when she did out weekly marketing. 

It's never the clubs, Laddie. 

PS:  The first album I bought on the "new" CD format was Thick As A Brick - the very notion of not having to flip the LP seemed tailor made for that record.  Woof!

When I first listened to the latest U2 album - "Songs of Innocence", I was extremely underwhelmed. I got it free from the original iTunes promotion, and I thought I got exactly what I paid for it.....nothing. Anyway, I've been listening to it recently in preparation for seeing U2 in Louisville for their 30th anniversary tour for The Joshua Tree (even though they haven't been playing any songs from the latest album on the tour). It has grown on me. I now think it's a fairly sold album. Granted, it's not one of U2's best, but that is comparing it to some GREAT albums. Compared to other recent releases from other active bands, I think it holds it's own.

When I was first getting into progressive music, I had no problems enjoying most of the better known bands (YES, Genesis, Camel, ELP, etc) on first listen.

But then, Gentle Giant's "Octopus" was recommended to me. I had no idea what to make of it. With all that counterpoint, complex vocal harmonies, dissonance, mixture of Medieval and contemporary classical, etc, it was a real head scratcher. 

After a few attempts to get into it, I put it on the shelf for a few months. I kept hearing what geniuses these guys were, so I finally gave it more chances.

Now, most of their catalog are "desert Island" material for me. 

Since then, there have been quite a few more bands, mostly on the avant garde side of prog that took a while to grow on me. Henry Cow, Thinking Plague, Magma, are a few examples.