Clarity Cap CMR Impressions


Hello!
Wondering if anyone has updated their passive crossover with the Clarity Cap CMR.
I'd like to hear how they compare to the MR and comparable competition. I saw some threads on the MR but not these.

Thanks 
Darren
128x128dmhenley
There are several factors, the bigger the UF- and higher voltage take longer 
In truth the 250v  is pretty big for the vast majority of Loudspeakers 
The CMR- caps are s naturally bigger cap then the Csa- caps 300hours + for the 
Cmr- caps, 200 hours for the 250v Csa- caps, the 400v st least another 50.

Referring yo the Mundorf Silver oil the are a paper coated with oil and the silver 
Particles impregnated on it ,not a paper in oil like Jensen.
It is a great cap for the tweeter as well as mids.  Your drivers will dictate 
Which have better characteristics .  Mundorf Supreme as good maybe a bit more 
Depth then the Clarity CSA. That being said I took  a .22uf Mundorf Silver oil for bypass caps
And I though it was more s bit open the the Cmr on top, s bit more air around instruments  A great combo.22 I like better then .1 ,these are big caps for a bypass caps though .I bought a bunch at  dealers cost and making use of them.
This is why I only use Mundorf Silver oil as s bypass cap the slight silver and smoothness adds to open the top a bit as well as of image depth.
In my experiences over the many years .
I’m sorry to tell you but you use mundorf capacitors and do not know how they are done.
they are polypropylene silver in oil: If you do not believe me ask someone else, or better directily to mundorf.

if you like mundorf sound you will continue to use them to have special effects to sound, but they are not natural.
The MundorfSilver oil will have a bit more air around instruments  due to the Silver,one is not better then the other they are close all depending where it is going in the circuit
Cmr 
I have use these new Cmr and Mundorf Silver oil  much more so.
the Silver oil will give you a bit more expansiveness around the instruments 
in Silver has something to do with it .  That being said  the new Cmr are very well balanced with possibly a bit better image depth. The big question is where you are using them in a circuit, and character of not only the driver, but sonic said of current system and what type of change you are trying to achieve. I have used a Duelund cap ,as well as JupiterCopper and a less expensive caps performed better, sometimes to rich can mask other frequencies in a circuit.
a perfect example I wanted a very well balanced cap for midrange just by chance 
I had both a 2.2uf Mundorf Silver oil , and 5.6uf of the New Clarity Csa cap.
to make a 8uf cap . I gave it 100 hours on first listen sounded pretty dawn good 
200 hours  is pretty close .the Mundorf takes better then 300 hours  but at 200 hours I liked it better then the new Cmr. It has very good grip as well as Very good depth and air around the instruments . 10-12% Mundorf Silver oil .
i only solder small cap about 1 inch from lead out on bigger cap.a engineer told me this a long time ago ,some put it way down 6 inches away . This is a excellent 
combination and does not break the bank and can be used in tight space.
you can use the 250 v version of CSA. For Bass I used the 33uf CSA, replacing Solen  it is 2.5 bigger around , and night and day better more defined Bass dynamics,speed,and image depth.  I rate this caps actually a full 9.5 possibly slightly better. Tony  at humble home Madehifi was being very conservative 
if you read through the lines he stated CSA made a more dramatic impact 
that being said only moved it .5 as well as Cmr. ? Sometimes  it is best not to ruffle feathers for he is sent all caps he request for Free. I have been around this industry for over 30 years .the new CSA are a exception buy , for Bass done deal
for topend, a .22 Mundorf Silver oil, for midrange 10% ,Silver oil.
i have tried in electronics as well as 2 types of speakers.