Finding the 'weakest link' when upgrading?


Being able to find the weakest link when upgrading is really, really important.
Otherwise a different new component may never really be able to show how it is better. Since the other ’weak’ component(s) is(are) masking the new components better sound.

This is a difficult problem.

My best example is not exactly about the least sound quality, but it may show something about it.
I upgraded a good portion of my equipment all at once when I retired. And I still had in my system an old DAC I bought used. When I received most of the new components (including new preamp, new amp, new speakers and a new turntable and cartridge), I was comparing my old DAC with the new one. And found no sonic difference. I mean I tried every way I could and could not hear any difference between them/ So either I just wasted $25,000 for nothing or?? I was very frustrated.
Anyway, after three weeks I got another new bit which had to be ordered and built
.
When I plugged in the phono box, an epiphany and a flood ot tears.. My $25,000 of new equipment really was better. Since the phono box sounded glorious, thus it made it clear all the rest of the system WAS NOT holding back the new DAC. That new DAC was actually just not any better than my old one. And I returned it.

And unless I just happened to acquire that new phono box a week later, I would have been stumped why the new DAC (which was praised to the skies by both Stereophile and TAS) was not doing better.
I was seriously bummed and confused about wasting a ton of money... until I played the new phono box.

Now it was kind of odd that the two DACs, one, used for $250 )it’ original list price was $1,000) and the other $2,400 and 12 years newer) could sound so alike. But chance happened. (And toss in the official guru magazine praise with it all)
==================================================================

Anyway, how do we find the right part to upgrade? Since making the wrong choice can leave one in the same boat I was in back in my example? (at least until I got the phono box)

I do not have an answer. and I ask.. does anyone?
For me it is just kind of a sixth sense, with little real science to it.

In general I have been kind of lucky.
But how do I know I have managed well?

I do not know.
It has been better more often than not.
(Though I have made a few really terrible choices over many years now and then. Costly choices)

Anyway, my question is how do you make the choice of what to upgrade?
How do you know or decide which is you weakest component?

And do you agree finding the weakest component is really important in the path of upgrading, or one might be making expensive mistakes buying gear, or trying gear? (which may really be great, yet you cannot hear it due to some other weak links in the chain? And though I hate to say so, this weak link may even be cables, or powercords or even the AC from the wall*.

*(but please do not get into a big theory arguments about interconnects and powercords and power conditioners.) Stick to the main topic of knowing how to find the weakest link.
elizabeth
If you evaluate and upgrade only one component at a time, you can avoid a lot of missteps.
"" If you evaluate and upgrade only one component at a time, you can avoid a lot of missteps.""
That is true.

But how do you KNOW which component to upgrade?
Are you guessing at which one is the worst sounding of the bunch?
Perhaps you are dead certain which one is the worst?
Choosing the cheapest/oldest one?
Picking one you want to replace because you saw a shiny new 'better' one in a review?
Perhaps because you have a long term plan and you just go on down the list as you can afford to upgrade the next item on the list?
You happened by accident to see something for sale at a great price and decided 'Why not'?
You have a BIG pile of money to burn and buy your dream components?

(I think in my 50 years as a person who owns stereo equipment.. I have used all of the above as reasons.)
But what is YOUR methodology?
elizabeth I would say unless you have what would seem to be an obvious mismatch it can frankly be impossible to tell. In fact if the system is sounding good and you're really enjoying it, perhaps there is no "weak link" per se? The potential for improvement is surely almost always there but at what cost? Monetarily and aggravation and timewise. The good news is you obviously listen to your ears, to me that's the most important step.
"" it can frankly be impossible to tell""
I think there are ways to figure it out, just trying to find what folks think are the ways?

In fact I also think it is a great challenge to find the weakest link.
Part of it is knowing what one really wants to have 'more of'..or 'less of'.
Like less grain. or more clarity, greater dynamics, less treble harshness... greater warmth, less wooly bass ... etc.

I can see where if folks are unsure what they really want.. it would be impossible.


Want the biggest and best change for your system? Sure you do! BUY A BETTER PAIR OF SPEAKERS! They are the weak link and worst measuring of all components! Many speakers cannot even play back a simple pulse - yet are beloved and touted by the "golden ear" crowd! The ancient Quad ESL passes the impulse test with ease and sounds better than 99% of present day speakers!