"RUSH" Vinyl remasters vs CD --Sound differences...OPINIONS?


Is it just me or do these vinyl remasters sound "warm".  To me, it seems everything is recessed sounding or laid back. 

In contrast the CDs sound more forward ,upfront  and focused more sharply. More intricate.

I am surprised at this . This is not a "which is better analog or digital "discussion!!!

 Simply, I was expecting the same "sound" as the CD  but more "analogy". If that makes sense.

I've enjoyed many vinyl remasters that did not strike me in this fashion.

The difference in the performance of my digital and analog front end are negligible. They perform very well. An A/B comparison was easily done.

Just wondering. Any RUSH fans out there?  Notice the same thing?

thanks

mike


128x128mikepaul
Plenty of RUSH fans out there. Great musicians. Exit stage left is great it breathes and has atmosphere. Their studio stuff seems too dry or cleansed - too much studio tweaking perhaps chasing perfection.
I am a Rush fan
In general I find their LP and CD to not sound as good as I would like on my system. A little flat. Thought is just my system but I have started to think it is their 
recording style   It is every  CD and LP of theirs on my system sounding this way

I still play them regularly.

R

No... your analogy doesn't make sense, at least to me.

If you wanted a more "analog" sound in the first place, you should change formats. Having said this, These Rush re-masters are not the reference to make this sort of decision.

 
As a fan since 1977, I find it highly offensive listening to Rush albums through any means other than an original press LP.

Nickleback CD  on repeat as punishment!!!!

The used bins reward those with patience/persistence, IMHO.
my old cd's are from years ago . i was expecting to be blown away .i just feel the new remasters sound "suppressed" and one dimensional. just my opinion. but....

...i have to find one in the bin.

 then compare.

 let you know what happens.