Tekton DI Monitors


Finally got to see the measurements for the Double Impact monitors. I’m a little disappointed.

https://www.stereophile.com/content/tekton-design-impact-monitor-loudspeaker-measurements

This woofer - tweeter - woofer configuration is similar to the style named after the esteemed Joseph D’Appolito. Done well this configuration functions like a single large woofer in terms of dispersion. Less floor and ceiling bounce yield better detail at the listening position. 

Interestingly, the Audiogon craze of criticizing the tweeter array for possible comb filtering is not what I’m sad about. In fact the array appears to be the least of the issues. Look at figure 4. The horizontal plots are superbly clean. Any comb filtering from the tweeter array would be displayed here, and it’s not. Those critics going nuts about the array’s poor performance can apologize for their uninformed criticism right now.

The problem is really the vertical response. It is terrible. Here we do have evidence of comb filtering! See the plot closest to the viewer in figure 5? See the regularly occurring hills and valleys completely absent from figure 4? That my friends is comb filtering. However it’s not coming from the tweeter array, but from the two widely placed woofers. There’s also a great deal of hash above 5kHz on this same plot. This makes me so very very sad.

Part of this is fixable. As Dr. D’Appolito discovered, the designer should have used a higher order crossover slope, which would have taken care of the hash above 5 kHz. However the comb filtering below this is not easily remedied. The issue has to do with how far away the two woofers are from each other. They are so far, and cut in so high that they can’t help but interfere with each other and this woofer to woofer distance is ultimately controlled by the size of the tweeter array.

Should you buy this speaker? I think you should listen to it. See how it sounds to you as you move around your listening space. If you find yourself enamored of the mid-treble resolution and detail, I would encourage you to listen to other Tekton designs that don’t attempt a D’Appolito design, because I'm afraid that the main benefit of this type of design, narrow mid-woofer dispersion, is lost.  A simpler 2-way would avoid these issues and be as good at detail and resolution 
erik_squires
Hey facten, 

Let me be very clear and precise, for my personal taste the DI Monitors did out perform the speakers that I mentioned.  I could have purchased any other of the speakers I reviewed.  However, I did not, but did purchase the review pair of DI Monitors for the reasons I mentioned in my review.  That does not mean the other speakers are still not excellent products and fine music makers.  Eric figured out something with his new design that for me sounds more like the illusion of real music in my systems.
Hello Eric,
I appreciate your critique of the Tektons from the perspective of a speaker builder. Do you believe you could produce an equal or superior speaker for the 2000.00 USD retail price of the Impact monitor? I ask this with genuine curiosity and respect (no implied snarky attitude). This speaker has received much praise based on listening which in my opinion is the most relevant factor.
Thanks ,
Charles
Hi Charles,

My critique may be a moot point is listeners don't mind the off axis performance or plan on only listening in one fixed location. 

I think that for the same price, a slight re-arrangement of the woofers along with a higher order crossover could perform better. So, in that sense, yes I think I might be able to best the monitors. :) Take a look at the vertical dispersion (fig. 5) of the Tekton Enzo to see what I mean. 

https://www.stereophile.com/content/tekton-design-enzo-xl-loudspeaker-measurements

As for the price, Tekton is getting an amazing price break from SB Acoustics in order to make those price points with seven tweeters. I think that the combination of interesting and very well behaved tweeter array plus components make the speakers a potentially very good value (assuming they sound good). If I had to sell speakers for $2k and make a profit, I'd probably try a much more traditional line array. It is quite a challenge! And not one I would attempt commercially. 

Best,

Erik
teajay,

Curiosity question, for the reviews of the NSMT (2012), Lawrence (2013), and Role (2017) were you using the same amplifiers and sources as you noted in the DI Monitor review? 
Iam glad my ears can’t see measurement, Once I was able to synergize my Impact monitor to my system, there is the enjoyment, I REMAIN SEATED....closed my eyes and feel the beautiful music coming out from this speakers....