Do speaker cables need a burn in period?

I believe the "famous" measurements referenced by Geoff are from the paper linked below;
http://www.hifi-tuning.com/pdf/wlfr.eng.pdf
For an even more enthusiastic testimonial about audible improvements, refer to the Positive Feedback Issue 51 article by Myles B. Astor;
https://positive-feedback.com/Issue51/hifi_tuning.htm
Draw your own conclusions.

None of those numbers in that first set of data for FUSE direction 1 vs. 2 are qualifed as statistically significant. We’re talking differences in microOhm and there should be at least three measurements per trial so that a standard deviation is calculated. But of course, a single number stands as "accurate."

The directionality in our subjective minds is far more compelling than any microOhm differences. I’ll bet no one on earth can hear such differences, only if THEY WANT TO.

But put it under blinded A/B/X testing and the whole house of cards falls apart, which is why the proponents are so quick to avoid such testing. Oh, you mean you're telling me you can't hear with the lights out? Yeah, uh huh..

Cables don’t need burn in. Electrons are in orbital shells in the metal atoms and are not in the least influenced in any lasting or "memory" manner by current applied. This is silly to the point of hilarity to the point of sadness.

And, what the heck do FUSES have to do with SPEAKER CABLES anyway? The direction the wire was pulled? In any of these studies was the resistance correlated with direction of wire pull? I thought so.

Direction does not matter. I tried. Next thread, please.

Maybe it isn't the wire burning in. Could it be the connections forming a bridge?