I have not seen these outlandish claims cable manufacturers make. What are you guys talking about? Can someone do me a solid and post some of them. I want to viddy them with my own eyes 👀 Share! Share!
blueranger I think the nonbelievers are overlooking the circumstantial evidence of the vast numbers of listeners that can tell a difference and the cable manufacturers that spend untold thousands of careful listening hours to perfect their products while listening to burn in.. In a court of law would this prove burn in is not a fallacy but true? Known science would be taken into consideration.
>>>>>I hate to judge too quickly but my sense is that naysayers aren’t really interested in evidence. Whoa! Did I just say that?! 😳
The opinion of a vast number of listeners , pro or con, doesn't rise to the level of circumstantial evidence. It seems to be on audio forums and popular TV shows but not in court. Opinions are not admisible as circumstantial evidence in court unless they are given by credtialed experts. This notion
"the vast numbers of listeners that can tell a difference and the cable manufacturers that spend untold thousands of careful listening hours"
is circumstantial evidence in court is wrong, it's opinion and would not be admissible.
I’m pretty sure opinion is admissible in court. Some opinion is more “expert” than others, that’s all. That’s why, in the case of judges or lawyers’ opinions, they’re called legal opinions. Anyway, that’s my opinion. 😳
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.