Jaynmo,
The M4 Turbo S speakers which I first had had an impedance of 4 ohms, which of course was a poor match for my flea-watt Dennis Had amp. However, with the M4 Triode Masters, Clayton has modified the speaker to present a 12 ohm load, much more favorable to a tube amp.
I have Don Sachs' tube preamp and i got a chance to audition his Kootenay 120 tube amp last week in my system, which has 65 wpc. I, and the audiophile who bought Don's amp for us to hear, both quickly and decisively concluded that we greatly preferred the SQ of the speakers with Don's tube amp compared to my very fine SS amp. (As an aside, he went home and ordered a pair of M3TM to replace his $8500 "box" speakers, feeling that the OB speakers had an openness and expansive soundstage to which his conventional speakers could not compare.)
With the tube amp, the music was presented with luscious liquidity and, most surprising to me, a potent grasp of the low response. The instruments were palpable in the expansive soundstage. I was pretty much blown away as I have never heard a tube amp with such authority and extension and such a natural presentation of the music. I conclude that this performance is a function of the 12 ohm impedance of the Triode Masters -- a much more compatible load for any amp, either SS or a tube. YMMV with different speakers.
Don's amp is sweetly compatible with my speakers, but I am intrigued with the Carver for its long tube life and its affordable cost. I frankly doubt it would sound as fine as the Kootenay amp, but I would sure like to hear one for comparison purposes.
I heard the Immorata auditioned by Jeff Wells in his listening room some years back, and couple of other times at audio shows, and came away with the impression that his amp provided a glimpse of the finest amplification that one could ever experience, pretty much regardless of price. I wonder how my Platinum-upgraded DNA-05 would compare to the Immorata?
Thanks for post.
The M4 Turbo S speakers which I first had had an impedance of 4 ohms, which of course was a poor match for my flea-watt Dennis Had amp. However, with the M4 Triode Masters, Clayton has modified the speaker to present a 12 ohm load, much more favorable to a tube amp.
I have Don Sachs' tube preamp and i got a chance to audition his Kootenay 120 tube amp last week in my system, which has 65 wpc. I, and the audiophile who bought Don's amp for us to hear, both quickly and decisively concluded that we greatly preferred the SQ of the speakers with Don's tube amp compared to my very fine SS amp. (As an aside, he went home and ordered a pair of M3TM to replace his $8500 "box" speakers, feeling that the OB speakers had an openness and expansive soundstage to which his conventional speakers could not compare.)
With the tube amp, the music was presented with luscious liquidity and, most surprising to me, a potent grasp of the low response. The instruments were palpable in the expansive soundstage. I was pretty much blown away as I have never heard a tube amp with such authority and extension and such a natural presentation of the music. I conclude that this performance is a function of the 12 ohm impedance of the Triode Masters -- a much more compatible load for any amp, either SS or a tube. YMMV with different speakers.
Don's amp is sweetly compatible with my speakers, but I am intrigued with the Carver for its long tube life and its affordable cost. I frankly doubt it would sound as fine as the Kootenay amp, but I would sure like to hear one for comparison purposes.
I heard the Immorata auditioned by Jeff Wells in his listening room some years back, and couple of other times at audio shows, and came away with the impression that his amp provided a glimpse of the finest amplification that one could ever experience, pretty much regardless of price. I wonder how my Platinum-upgraded DNA-05 would compare to the Immorata?
Thanks for post.