Why Power Cables Affect Sound

prof,
You missed a couple of your recent quotes in your post above, so I'll add them:
" Or, an alternative possibility is that you have wasted money on a product whose performance was oversold to you"
"And we are getting just as great results without wasting money"

That stated, "wasted money" is a rather harsh statement for those of us who do hear an improvement in sound quality from power cords even though you don't, especially since the OP specifically asked that " If you don’t think power cables matter at all, please refrain from derailing the conversation with antagonism"

Kosst, 
" Why not spend $1500 on a power cord that would do the same job as a $5 length of 14g lamp cord and $10 worth of caps, resistors, and inductors! If your goal is to clean up the power supply, THEN FIX THE POWER SUPPLY. This isn't rocket surgery!"
A couple things here:
1. There is no such thing as "rocket surgery"
2. You don't need to spend $1500 to get an improvement from a power cord
3. The power supply of an amplifier is not the end all to sound quality.  

Has anyone done an ABX test of power cords and seen a positive result?

That's what I'm wondering too. Would love to see if anyone has done that. 

@boxer12

mrdecibel wrote: "Again, after the last post from prof and analogluvr, they are simply missing out on the fact that " after market power cables " make a difference, and generally, improvements. So, while I am enjoying these improvements in sq in my listening, they are still battling it. "

In other words, he confidently declares he gets to enjoy the audible benefits of AC cables while poor sods like us "battle" the idea. As if there are no POSSIBLE downsides to his claim.

Therefore I presented an alternative POSSIBILITY - note how I used that word? It’s not a declaration of fact, only another POSSIBILITY that others may consider - that of paying much more money for products that don’t in fact do what they claim to do - even if mrdecibel refuses to ever question his position.

I’ve been presenting a reasoned defense for skepticism about AC cable claims, with civility, and constantly keeping those claims modest and saying "I could be wrong, I’m not claiming anyone here is wrong, I’m not claiming to know people aren’t hearing sonic differences, I’m open to the idea AC cables alter sound."
Again...that is FAR more open minded and conciliatory to the other side than the attitude the pro-cable folks have shown me here.

Whereas folks like nonoise reply with insults like "you have issues" and mrdecibel "I have no reason to respond to your ignorance or foolishness."

Why don’t you take their tone to task, I wonder?


Why do the Cable supporters get the free pass with snark and insult, but presenting an alternative view is "derailing" a thread with "antagonism?"

I keep trying to shine at least some light on the weird bias that goes on here, where cable-lovers seem like they process any skepticism as either dogmatism or antagonistic, and THEY are the ones who typically respond with blatantly insulting tones.