2. digital
  3. 137205-1252

Marantz SA-10 arriving Monday!

I've been hearing and reading all I can about this player during this last year. I have a 6005 right now and it's a nice player but not as good as my analog rig (10k) so it's not a fair comparison. Elizabeth mentioned that her SA-10 is better than her analog. I will be comparing the 2 SACD players side by side. I have at least 3 CD's in which I have duplicates. I'm fascinated about how the circuitry upsamples to DSD SACD. Well not exactly but somehow an improvement over Redbook CD. I have a 2" thick maple block coming in the same day for it. It's going to be a long weekend. I know it can't work miracles on all CD's. If there is jitter in the recording then supposedly you will never get that out. Speak up if I'm wrong about that.
128x128blueranger
jafant
10,525 posts
 

vassilis_t

Thank You for sharing your purchase experience w/ the SA-10.

My closest area, Atlanta, does not have one for audition. The search continues...  Happy Listening!

jafant
10,525 posts
 

blueranger

Thanks! for sharing some of your fave discs. Are you playing single-layer SACD titles as well? I would be interested in reading about comparisons between SL and Hybrid (cd plus sacd layer) selections.


Happy Listening!

blueranger's avatar
blueranger OP
575 posts
 
Both but don't never thought that single layer and hybrids could sound different? Interesting
elizabeth
6,726 posts
 
I am of an opinion that many hybrid layer CD portion of SACD are also BETTER MASTERED than the previous generation plain CD.I have no proof, but seems that way to me.            
And I am listening to CDs 99.9% of the time.(I own 2,600 CDs, and maybe 10 SACD! (8 of which are hybrid) I own two really early SACD which have no CD layer.
geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
14,147 posts
 
One wonders if the CD layer suffers the same overly aggressive compression as the SACD layer? 😬
More to discover