2. amps-preamps
  3. 145423-10803

New McIntosh amp build quality

I've been doing some research on the new MC 275 Mark VI. I've only heard the amp for a few minutes. I thought the 275 sounded nice. On another thread, a person stated the new Macs are not built as well as the older ones and in fact said the build was "shoddy" compared to pervious years. Just curious how owners of newer Mac amps feel about the build quality vs the old ones. Maybe a Mark V is a better option. I'm not looking for alternative brands...I have that info that is a mile long. Specifically the build (and sound) of new 275's (or new Mac amps in general) vs older versions. 

Thanks
aberyclark
mcgal
189 posts
 
I agree with roadsterlover. I also had a pair of MC275 VI's hocked up as monos. No problems whatsoever but I do prefer 2 to one. I now have two MC2301 mono's which I love even more.
theothergreg
219 posts
 
One other thing to consider is that the 75 wpc rating is conservative.  They are closer to 90 wpc in stereo and 180 wpc in mono.
aberyclark OP
594 posts
 
Yes, I have very efficient speakers (Zu Omen Defs at 101 db), so one would be all I need. However, two would really look good :)
tastyfreeze's avatar
tastyfreeze
94 posts
 
I have pushed amps under harder conditions.   I have had to service two McIntosh amps, but both amps returned in stellar condition.  A big thank you to the "old man" who serviced the unit.    
dar97691
2 posts
 
I received my MC2152 about 10 days ago and the build quality is phenomenal.  I’ve upgraded to several different Mac products this year and every one has been flawless out of the box.  Yes I have read reports of others that have not been so lucky but my experience has been great.
More to discover