Oracle CDP 2000 vs 1000

"In a highly resolving system, the superiority of the CD-2000 is quite apparent."

Well, I didn't say they are the same, just pretty much similar. I heard them both with Martin Logan Pro and Audio Research MkIII, using Audio note 3x DAC, and then MF Trivista 21... and the sound was not much diffrence. And the Saleman of the store also agreed with that So I don't know what other HIGHER SYSTEM that Bill listened to ??? And don't know the above system I've listened to is high enough for the CDT2000 !!!???
Honestly, I prefer the CDT2000 over the CDT1000 because of the look, but with the price of CDT2000 over CDT1000 (and has only "more sophisticated and innovative suspension system than the CD-1000", unless I won the lotto....otherwise wouldn't waste bucks on it. Because "Both however, share the same transport and electronics."
That's why I told Laurent : it's your call ! If you can afford then go ahead....

Are you saying that the AN 3x isn't much better than the Trivista 21?

I was comparing CDT2000 vs CDt1000, not DAC comparation

I own the Oracle 2000 and have it hooked-up via using a Stealth Sextet digital cable (AES connection) with a Accustic Arts dac MK4 and it is absolutely amazing.

I did have a Oracle 1000 transport that I also demoed in the same set-up, you can not compare the two.

Right from the get go the design is totally different.

The two do not sound similar, if the 1000 did I would have bought it and saved a whole lot of money.

Now this is with my set-up so others may differ.

Dev
Lynn at Oracle sez the the BNC is the best output and that the two uit sound the same.