The Thiels might sound lean to those who aren't used to Jim Thiel's sound signature but having owned and loved the CS2.4SEs and now CS3.7s, I don't find it lacking much to be honest. If there's a lot of bass in the source, the 3.7s (and 2.4s) will reproduce it, but it wouldn't add more bass bloom if it isn't there.
The 3.7s despite having only 1-2Hz extension on paper lower than the 2.4s sounds a lot more filled out on the lower octaves than the 2.4s.
I still ended up with a dual SS2.2 sub to augment the 3.7s for stereo music once I moved to a bigger room for the last mile. By then I was already so invested in the sound of the Thiels and didn't want to muck it up by going a different brand.
I run Project RPM10.1 evolution with Sumiko BlackBird, Bel Canto Phono3 and EMM Labs XDS1 for source, ARC Reference 5SE for pre and Electrocompaniet Nemos for power. Cables are primarily ASI Liveline (power and XLR). Sound Conditioner is Sound Application RLS240
The 3.7s despite having only 1-2Hz extension on paper lower than the 2.4s sounds a lot more filled out on the lower octaves than the 2.4s.
I still ended up with a dual SS2.2 sub to augment the 3.7s for stereo music once I moved to a bigger room for the last mile. By then I was already so invested in the sound of the Thiels and didn't want to muck it up by going a different brand.
I run Project RPM10.1 evolution with Sumiko BlackBird, Bel Canto Phono3 and EMM Labs XDS1 for source, ARC Reference 5SE for pre and Electrocompaniet Nemos for power. Cables are primarily ASI Liveline (power and XLR). Sound Conditioner is Sound Application RLS240