WAV vs. AIFF


Is there any benefits/disadvantages of one of these over the other? I have read the one advantage of AIFF is that it carries meta tags, but are there any other differences? WAV is said to be an exact match of the original, what makes AIFF different that Apple felt the need to create it?
brianmgrarcom
I know how you feel Jpod! That is interesting about AIFF.

FWIW, I have copied the same song to my iPod 3 times the following ways:

AIFF with Error Correction on
Apple LossLess with EC on
WAV (no EC because it was already on my iPod that way)

I will try and do as you say, come to my own conclusions.
I was quite impressed with the Exemplar cdserver at both the RMAF and CES. It uses Windows XP so I had no choice but to use WAV with maximum avoidance of error correction. It goes to my Exemplar dac by way of a Lynx AES/EBU output. Thus far this is the best reproduction of digital I have heard. I have four Macs including the one that I use as a remote desktop to run the server. I have heard Macs used driving a dac through the USB2 port, but it is not really close. I do wish it were possible to get Mac processors for use in the server but think it is impossible.
How do file sizes differ WAV vs AIFF vs Apple Lossless vs FLAC?

Does iPod play FLAC? iTunes?
(I don't see where iTunes will rip cds into FLAC)

Thanks,
Art