New tubes in Rogue M-180 Monoblocks

The 120's draw greater heater current then the 90's. You have to make sure that your amp will handle that.
Alan

I've been running KT-120s in my M-180s for about 6 months. I'm still using the 12A*7 tubes that the amps shipped with.

Yes, I'd say it's worth it. My comments at the time I did the replacement were:

"They just give you more of everything: more treble, more colors, more drama. As happy as I was with the original sound of the Rogues, I always wanted a bit more texture and warmth on massed strings, and the KT-120s give you that."

Also, from what I've read, the KT-120 is a more robust tube than the KT-90. Depending on usage, I'd expect to have to replace 1-2 KT-90s a year (and a fuse blows when the tube blows). I haven't had a KT-120 blow yet, but only more time will tell.

08-29-12: Daverz
Also, from what I've read, the KT-120 is a more robust tube than the KT-90. Depending on usage, I'd expect to have to replace 1-2 KT-90s a year (and a fuse blows when the tube blows). I haven't had a KT-120 blow yet, but only more time will tell.

That seems like very poor longevity/reliability from the KT90 tubes - unless you're running the amps 24/7?
I bought my ARC amp S/H and I'm still using the same output tubes (SED winged C 6550) after 2 years. ARC tend to run tubes on a pretty rich bias too.

I'll chime in and completely agree with Daverz but add that there seems to be more lower end punch as well with the KT-120 tubes. Highly recommended if your amps can handle them.

Just curious, but I have had a few people tell me that the "sparkle" of the 120 tube seems to wear off a bit after listening to them for a while. Sort of like the new car smell going away after driving your car for a few months. And that the 120s can be a bit harsh. They all went back to 90's after trying them.

I take it most of you are not getting this?

I've not tried any 120's in my demo gear here. I may need to just purchase a few and see how it goes.