SACD Player Mods vs. Outboard D/A converter?


I own a SOny SCD-C555es SACD changer Which I am happy with for SACD playback, but the Red Book playback is leaving something to be desired. Any thoughts about pros and cons of having my player modified with a new clock, output stage, capactiors, power cord, etc. vs getting a new D/A converter?
jptenberg
Get a Chord DAC 64 and any transport jumps levels in musical presentation. I have one and use an Electrocompaniet, a Pioneer 300 disc changer, and a Sony 333 changer as transports. All sound great through it with no mods.
Keep in mind, going the mod route saves you the added expense and anxiety of a digital cable and a second power cord. (Anxiety because you have to worry about whether you have made the best choices. Some of us like the angst, though.)

My impression is that most of the mods are strictly parts upgrades. This raises a fundamental question in my mind: What is the relative importance of parts quality vs. circuit design? Of course they both matter, but what I am asking is, can you take the basic Sony (or other brand) circuitry and get near state-of-the-art performance merely by upgrading the parts? Or is a different circuit design needed? If I had any engineering background, I might have an informed opinion on this question.
According to Paul Bui who own the sony dvp 9000es,
the tube output and dac upgrade made a whole lot a
diferrence, I send mind to Dan sony 9000es, for
The Reference Mod. I trust him.If you go to
harmonicdiscord.com So many posted there about
mod. You can read the positive feedback
from R Kern and D Wright.
GOOD LUCK
i am currently using a sony sacd1 with a dodson d/a and the result is most impresive.