proac 2.5, heron i,or virgos

I just bought Heron i speakers. I was lucky enough to hear them at home with a Classe Ca 151. The combination was great, and I am looking for a good deal on a Classe 201. I can tell you for sure that the Meadowlarks are great speakers. They do everything right, including amazing bass, imaging, soundstage and detail. The Classe was smooth and natural, never hard to listen to, no listener fatigue. I heard the Virgos at my dealer before I bought the Herons from him. I chose the Meadowlarks, for what I thought was a sweeter and more natural midrange, and much better bass. I am unsure why they are not more popular. I think for the money, they are the best I could have gotten. If you email me, I could tell you where you could find a great deal on a pair.

TRYING TO COMPARE MEADOWLARK TO AUDIO PHYSIC IS LIKE COMPARING PEUGOT TO BMW OR MERCEDES.i DONT THINK YOU WILL HAVE A HARD TIME DETERMINING THE DIFFERENCE IN CLARITY MUSICALITY AND SEAMLESSNESS.PRO-AC IS EVEN BETTER THAN MEADOWLARK.I WILL TELL YOU THAT VIRGO'S LOVE TUBES

i've heard the meadowlark kestrel hot-rod, the proac tablette signature 2000's, the proac 1.5's the proac 2.5's. the meadowlark was very nice, but even the little tablette 2000 was better, in all areas, except, of course, the bass. the proacs are much more transparent than the hot-rod kestrel, at least - dunno about the heron. also haven't heard the audio-physic... but, even the li'l tablette is quite a bit more $$$ than the kestrel... doug