I'm not gonna spend too much time or get technical here but here is what i just discovered re:...
j river vs media monkey for ripping cd to flac...
Result... the files ripped by mediamonkey sound better.
The files ripped by jriver sounded ridiculously bass heavy and the mids were flat and distant.
It sounded like i was listening to a mid grade stereo system with the bass cranked and everything else dialed way down.
Which program is easier to use/ better features/ faster?
i dont know or care.
Did i expect this result?
No.
I expected j river to do a better job based on my reading in 'absolute sound' mag. (they glowed over j river and poo-pood mediamonkey) (i still trust them on opinions, but i trust my own ears much more)
Yes, all the variables for ripping were identical, I'm not going to go on and on with the details to prove how smart I am. Just wanted to share the results that i found surprising.
j river vs media monkey for ripping cd to flac...
Result... the files ripped by mediamonkey sound better.
The files ripped by jriver sounded ridiculously bass heavy and the mids were flat and distant.
It sounded like i was listening to a mid grade stereo system with the bass cranked and everything else dialed way down.
Which program is easier to use/ better features/ faster?
i dont know or care.
Did i expect this result?
No.
I expected j river to do a better job based on my reading in 'absolute sound' mag. (they glowed over j river and poo-pood mediamonkey) (i still trust them on opinions, but i trust my own ears much more)
Yes, all the variables for ripping were identical, I'm not going to go on and on with the details to prove how smart I am. Just wanted to share the results that i found surprising.