Cary 300SEI vs Art Audio PX-25


Currently have the Cary. Considering the AA. I'm driving a pair of AKG K1000 headphones ONLY now. Worth the change? Nothing wrong with Cary just looking for different experience. Just didn't want to fidelity for new experience. Any comments greatly appreciated. Thanx
pawlowski6132
Yes, of course, Audiofeil, you are correct. It was a slip on my part. I realize the AA PX-25 has KR PX-25 tubes and not 300B! But it needed to be corrected, for which I thank you.
Art Audio always struck me as having a family sound that is a bit more linear and a bit more detailed on top (air) as compared to Cary. I love both though.
I've had the 300SEI and currently own the PX-25 in my system(Cain&Cain IM-Bens) and the two are totally different approaches to SET, sonically.

As pointed out, the Cary is ultra-lush, warm, rich sounding. Whether too much so or not is a matter of personal taste(way too much for me). An analogy might be that the PX-25 is fine silk and the 300SEI rich, blood red, velvet.

That's not to imply that the PX-25 is reserved or delicate sounding, just that it is more refined in every aspect while still delivering a musically vivid presentation. As one reviewer said "It's as if notes, instruments, are lit from within". It is also has amazing current drive capabilities for a SET, meaning some of the best bass response I've ever heard out of any SET amp. The PX-25 is truly one of the great SETs made.

As for the 300SEI, it lives for the midrange. A sort of hyper-reality in that band, but I can understand why loyal Cary fans love it. Unfortunately, I found it's low frequencies loose and poorly controlled.

I'm tired right now, but I'll try and be more descriptive tomorrow.