Passive Pre - No Regrets?

Man, it's nice to see a reasonable discussion about this topic that doesn't plunge into the ditch with personal attacks and such. I also like the insight into the design philosophy of 'sphere. Since I happen to agree, I'm now inclined to give their stuff a listen.

Obviously off topic, I've often thought that speaker companies could simply describe how they voice their speakers and save me a lot of trouble. I suppose this could be said with design philosophy of almost all gear. Save the marketing jargon and tell me what you consider important in the design.

I tried the RVC as a remote volume control for the CAT, the CAT sounds the same, or at least I can't tell the difference.I think the RVC is worth the price just as a remote volume control with no apparent harm to the CAT. If you own the CAT you know you need/want some finer volume settings. This RVC has me wondering about their active linestage. I'm thinking that much of what I like about the Placette might be attributed to the volume control itself (and address some of Atmasphere's concerns or issues with passives) Who has made the change from the passive Placette to the active? What were your impressions? How does this active Placette compare with great tube units (CAT, Joule, Atmasphere, First Sound, BAT, CJ, Lamm, etc). I'm especially interested if you have made the move from your beloved tube models to the Placette, and have had no regrets.

Started with a Bent Audio NOH (passive TVC, silver) and upgraded to latest Bent Audio TAP (TVC, silver). As Fazoid has observed, it was the best move I have made. When I recently swapped an active preamp, I knew just what made the TVC so special! If transparency and sonic purity is what you desire, the TVC is the way to go! I hear that the Promitheus TVC (Malaysian manufacture) sounds really good (I have no doubt) and comes with an attractive price tag. For those hesitating, it does not cost much to give TVCs a try. Once you are convinced, the convenience of the Bent Audio TAP (not to mention its beautiful futuristic look) is worth considering. I hear that Music First has entered into a deal with a Bent Audio to carry the TAP under the MF namesake. I also believe that John Chapman (real gentleman and genius, creator of TAP) is still offering the TAP under the Bent Audio badge for a few more weeks before the price goes up under the MF badge.

Denjo

Pubul57, I have in my system the Placette dual active line stage that replaced a Mark Levinson reference 32, that cost $10000.00 more then the Placette! However, it's performance was head and shoulders better then the ML-32.

The Placette was among six preamps, three were SS and three were tubed, that I auditioned before chosing the Placette for my system. It's a great preamp and I believe a bargain for $4500.00. If Guy sold his preamp through retail salons I believe the cost would be around $7500.00 to $8500.00 with the overall markup ratio.

Another Gon member finally found what he considered a better sounding preamp, the darTZell, which sells for almost $20000.00! That's quite a compliment considering the price difference.

A final thought, I believe that the active line stage is about 20% to 30% better in its sonic performance compared with the passive. You also might want to go back to the review that was in the Absolute Sound, that gave the Placette a "golden ear award", I believe it describes the sound of this preamp with great accuracy.

Thank you Teajay. I'll read the review. It would be worth it if the active was 10% better - we all accept diminishing returns at this end of the hobby. What tubed units were you audtioning at the time you chose to go with the Placette?