Presently I own the Ref 3 having previously owned the Ref 2 Mk ll (which BTW I loved). I never thought ARC would be able to improve upon the Ref 2 Mk ll which replaced my Krell KPS 25sc and before that the KRC-HR. All of these were great preamps.. Personally I don't believe that there is a better preamp than the Ref 3. However a very close runner up is the LS 26 which IMO is indeed a better preamp than the Ref 2 Mk ll. The LS 26 has much of the topology of the Ref 3 for 1/2 the price. If you were to never hear the LS 26 you would be very happy with the Ref 2 Mk ll but side by side for music the LS 26 would be the one that I would buy.
ARC LS26 vs Ref 2 Mk 2
Hi all,
I am considering buying a tube preamp to replace my Krell KRC-HR. I tried out my friend's ARC LS5, and while impressed by it's dimensionality and inner detail, I found it to be a bit hazy compared to the Krell's inky black background.
I am considering either a brand new ARC LS26 or a used ARC Ref 2 Mk 2 for the same price. Home audition of the Ref 2 is not possible.
Could anyone with experience of both please share their opinions? Musicality is my number one priority.
Thanks in advance
Mick
I am considering buying a tube preamp to replace my Krell KRC-HR. I tried out my friend's ARC LS5, and while impressed by it's dimensionality and inner detail, I found it to be a bit hazy compared to the Krell's inky black background.
I am considering either a brand new ARC LS26 or a used ARC Ref 2 Mk 2 for the same price. Home audition of the Ref 2 is not possible.
Could anyone with experience of both please share their opinions? Musicality is my number one priority.
Thanks in advance
Mick
- ...
- 11 posts total
- 11 posts total