Anthem, Rotel or Bryston ???


Hi there,

I'm considering a new amp because I think my old one (Myryad MA 240) might be "cooked". I did enjoy the Myryad while it was working but I think it might be time for a change only because I'm not exactly sure what's wrong with it and if it'd be worth fixing it. Anyway, here's what the rest of my system consists of:

Anthem TLP1 (preamp/tuner)
NAD CD 540 (modified)
StudioLAB Reference 1's (bookshelf version)
Various IC's and speaker wire

I went into one of the local stores and the gentleman there suggested that either one of the above mentioned (Anthem, Rotel or Bryston) should match up nicely with the rest of my system. The Anthem (new) could cost me anywhere between $800 - $1300 (depending on which one - either the PVA2 or the MCA20). They are clearing out the Rotel (I actually did not check which model it was) for around $500. And a new Bryston will cost me anywhere between $2500 - $3500. I'm not sure if I'm ready to drop that kind of money for the Bryston because I'm also considering adding a sub too so the extra money that I'd spend for a 2BSST or a 3BSST could go towards the cost of the sub. Anyway, I plan on listening to the Anthem (they only have the MCA20 in stock) and the Rotel too but thought I'd post something here to see if you guys can provide me with any experience you might have. My music tastes vary from A-Z. Every so often, I like to crank it, but that's not always the case. Will I notice much of a difference between the Anthem's as the PVA2 is rated at 125 watts/channel or 105 watts/channel with all channels driven and the MCA20 is rated at 225 watts/channel or 200 watts/channel with all channels driven ?

Thanks.
bacs68
Ok..just realized that you already OWN the TLP-1 (I need to read more carefully)....my apologies for the lengthy post...
Cudos for Bryston,I've owned most models before I graduated to tubes.Raquel is dead wrong,the SST series is far superior to the ST,macro dynamics and lower noise floor is very evident after several musical passages.At your price range you may also want to consider McCormack and Odyessy Stratos,the latter having a 20 year warranty.
Of those 3 - Bryston hands down. AND, I suspect, that once you have a fully broken-in Bryston on line, you will realize that you do not need a sub as bad as you think you did. I sure didn't. The Bryston add so much "kick" to my system that I was just fine.

My first "high end" amp was the classic 3B ST. Man, I have great memories of that one. I am currently listening to and reviewing the 4BSST (for www.positive-feedback.com). It is bringing back some fond listening memories.

Don't for get that Bryston is built like no other and have a unparelled 20 year transferable warrenty. Even used, I think you should get the Bryston over those 2 options.

Good Luck and remember to enjoy the search!

John
The SST line is in my opinion a better amp than the ST line. Noticeable improvements on the top end.

I have owned 3B-ST, 4B-ST, 7B-SST, and BP-25. I sold all but the 7B-SST. This is my long term keeper.
I have heard all 3 amps, and all are fine sounding. The Bryston is a step above, sound and build wise, but to me it's overpriced, especially if you can get the Rotel on sale. I might have a different answer if you had Maggies or Vandys to drive.

I would reserve some funds on the sub, if you're going that way. I would spend more on the sub than the amp. A musical sub is a quantum step above a mediocre one. When you buy a sub (or better stereo subs) you are also buying an amp! I have bought several cheap subs in the past and always regretted it.

This is off topic, but consider borrowing a TUBE preamp or integrated, to try at home, if you are like me, you will never go back. A good tube preamp brings music to life.