Traditional Brands vs. "Audiophile" Brands


I've visited some traditional brands websites and seen items like Yamaha A-S700, Denon DRA-CX3, Onkyo A-5VL, Onkyo A-9555, Sony STR-DA1500ES, etc.

These are all around $500 and up (MSRP).

Then you have more "audiophile" brands like Cambridge Audio, Marantz, NAD, Music Hall, Adcom, with their own integrated amps in a similar price range.

Questions to ponder:

So what is the difference here?

Can one assume that an audiophile brand of more or less the same price is superior to these "traditional" brands?

Are there advantages in scale, such as say, access to latest technologies before smaller manufacturers, that the traditional guys have?

If units from audiophile group aren't always better, what makes them "audiophile," or are they even that (or just my mis-categorization)?

Your cogitations welcome.

vivaslb
Details will vary but in general, at a particular price point "traditional Brands" will offer more features which may come at the expense of pure parts and build quality, and possibly, but not always, resulting sound quality.

"Audiophile" brands in general will offer less features and focus more on aspects designed for better sound.

That's not to say that one group categorically always sounds better than the other. YMMV. Its all in the overall execution and how well any particular device fits your needs.
"Aptquark, you had me laughing out loud for five minutes!"

Mitch, I had you beat by laughing an additional five minutes!
NAD is the brand that will stand above others in the same price range. If I were looking for a second system, NAD would be the amplifier part of the system, Marantz would be the CD player and the B&W speakers that would fit my budget.