What about 845 tubes on Wilson Sophia 3...?

Hal123,
It seems you trust your ears and choose based on what you hear, that's commendable. You weren't enamored with high power specs, congratulations on obtaining the Quads. I didn't know the Sophia was so easily driven, I like good quality lower power amplifiers(with appropriate speakers).
Regards,

Charles thank you for your response..I feel another journey has started as now I am on the era of single end triode's and I had a very high entusiasm and curiosity for trying many 845, KT66, 88-90-120's even 300B's..I count on wilsons for that manner because the flat response make it quite suitable for both solid state and tubed amplifiers..but sincerly I prefer tubes and tube sound..specs also are valuable but only I trust to my ears, I believe still physics doesnt defines the difference between solid state and tube design..but ears could understant this..by the way your system looks wonderfull congrats..

Thanks Hal for the kind comment about my system.

Hal, first of all congratulations on owning a great pair of speakers. When I was auditioning speakers several years back, I just loved the Sophia 3s. For what its worth, the Sophias I auditioned were driven by a BAT ss amp. I heard Watt Puppy8s the same day driven by a pair of BAT tube monoblocks, and I much preferred the Sophias with the SS amp. I love tube amps, but the Sophias driven by SS outclassed the Watt Puppies driven by tubes on that day. One of the most musical systems I heard.