2. analog
  3. 1368192381

Understanding Gain in the ARC Ref Phono 2 SE


On my ARC Ref Phono 2 SE, it has a high gain and low gain setting. I am having
to use the high gain setting for adequate volume output. The low gain is just
too quiet, even when I turn up my Rowland Synergy IIi volume all the way. Now, this was different on my Rowland Cadence where I could use the low gain settings on it and the volume would be just fine. Although the high gain setting in the ARC Ref Phono 2 SE is fine, I would like to use the low gain setting if at all possible as it optimizes the lowest electrical noisefloor.

So here is some info/technical data on my system:

Cart:

Dyna XV-1s:
Output 0.3 mV; resistive loading recommended > 30 ohms

Here was the typical settings I would have on the Rowland Cadence:

Low gain: 64 dB (high would be 74dB). Cart loading ranges from 30-400 ohms


Here is the ARC Ref Phono 2 SE: (I run SE from tonearm to phono pre, balanced out of phono pre)

Gain: 51 dB low gain, 74 dB high gain (BAL) ; 45dB low gain, 68 dB high gain
(SE)

Cart loading: 50-200 ohms

Output impedance: 400 ohm balanced out (recommended load 50K-100K ohm)

I'm guessing my volume in low gain on the ARC is due to running BAL (51dB)
compared to BAL on the Rowland Cadence at 64 dB. On to
something there?

Then I wonder despite the above if the pre amp specs may still play a role:

Rowland Synergy IIi

Input Impedance: BAL at 36K ohms or 600 ohms. This is switchable and default
is 36K ohms. Never tried the other lower ohm setting.

Output Impedance: Balanced at 80 ohms

Eventually if I purchased an ARC REf 5SE preamp, here are the ARC Ref 5SE preamp specs:

Input Impedance: 120K ohms balanced

Output Impedance: 600 ohms balanced; 20K ohm resistive load

So I'm guessing again its the difference in output in the BAL configuration low gain settings from the Cadence (64 dB) to the ARC low gain BAL (51dB). Any way to use the low gain setting in the ARC through my Rowland Synergy IIi to get adequate volume output without turning up the volume to maximum settings? Changing the input impedance of the Synergy to the lower ohm setting? Eventually would a new ARC Ref 5SE preamp help this?

Any input or advice would be appreciated as I would like to use the low gain setting in the ARC as I did in the Cadence.

philb7777
sarcher30
596 posts
 
Sounds like the gain on the ARC is either too low or too high. You could use an outboard SUT to get a more appropriate gain. Maybe try a 10x SUT with your low gain setting.

Your Rowland phono stage may just have a lower noise floor in general.

Which phono stage do you prefer regardless of noise?
desmokid
4 posts
 
It sounds better in high gain with medium and low output MC cartridges even if you can get by with low gain. It's nice and dynamic, powerful, and loses a lot of that power in low gain mode unless you are using a high output cartridge.

Since sounding rig.
philb7777 OP
401 posts
 
I prefer the ARC over the Cadence in my system. The Cadence is fanstastic. Super quiet but with my system a tad on the dark side. The ARC give much better continuity to the soundstage and all the good tube- stuff. Plus much better dynamics and ambient retrieval of space and info. Imaging density slightly better with the Cadence, but imaging in the ARC more 'realistic' if that makes sense.

I'm keeping both, but using the Cadence around 10% of the time to the ARC 90% of the time. When I get a second arm and cart for my table, I can have active use of both.

Good to know others with low output carts are using high gain in the ARC.
dctom
82 posts
 
I have the ARC ref 2 and use it with a BAT 52se. I had a Benz with an output of 0.35 which was OK with the low gain (balanced output) 95 vol setting (140 max). Also a vDH cart which is even lower, this was again ok at 95-104 vol.

If I want to listen to loud rock say N Young or White stripes I used the high gain.
I have recently purchased two new carts with outputs of 0.5 and 0.55. These work perfectly with the ref 2 on low gain.

I prefer the low gain as the ref2 gives a sweeter more realistic sound and produces a better image/stage, when listening to jazz or classical.

I think this is a flaw in the ARC, as for me, it rules out very low output carts. Fortunately there are some excellent higher output devices now.

Having said all this I dug out a 30yr old FR 1 iii to try. It sounded superb on the low setting with an output of.14Mv. However I needed to turn the vol to 110.

I think the BAT helps being virtually silent, even at high volume settings.

I recently compared an Allnic 3000 to the ARC. I was surprised to observe the Allnic has a considerably lower noise floor and much greater gain. I guess this is due to it's use of step up trans formers, which add a bit of extra colour.

I am hoping to upgrade to the ref2 se which I believe is quieter.
philb7777 OP
401 posts
 
Dctom -

The Ref 2 SE is super quiet. At a volume turned up to a meter level of 40/60 on my Rowland Synergy IIi and the high gain setting noisefloor is only audible when placing your ear a few inches away from the tweeter/mid. In low gain, still silent at those volume levels. Being used to solid state, I was amazed at how quiet tubes can be. The SE upgrade is probably well worth it.

My next carts will be in the 0.5 mV levels so I can utilize the low gain settings in the Ref 2Se more.
More to discover