The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones

If you had to choose that one of these groups never existed,which means that all their contributions to popular music never happened which one would it be?

qdrone11-06-2006 4:54am

...
56 posts total
View entire discussion

rloggie Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 102 posts 11-06-2006 at 09:45pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete To me, the Beatles defined a new style of music at the time whereas the Stones followed in a sorta pop way. Enjoyed all when it was new.
geoffkait Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 14,147 posts 11-06-2006 at 10:40pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Elizabeth, as always, you are full of surprises.
tvad Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 9,467 posts 11-07-2006 at 12:56am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete 11-06-06: Audiofeil >>I'd take the Stones over the Beatles in a bar brawl<< NO FAIR!!! Home field advantage. OK. Fair enough. Let's make it a fair fight. On the sidewalk at Abbey Road. Mick can be barefoot. Yoko can't particpate. That'd be five on four.
boa2 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 1,550 posts 11-07-2006 at 01:12am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Throw in Pete Best, and the match is on! The birds can watch, but someone better card Wyman's girl.
tvad Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 9,467 posts 11-07-2006 at 01:16am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete If you need to find Mrs. Wyman, I'd suggest the girls department at Harrod's. ;)

56 posts total
View entire discussion

More to discover