Vinyl Outselling CD


I am posting this article so that it will be in the Audiogon Forums database. I was looking for it the other day on here and I couldn't find it.

I am not posting this so we can debate the merits of vinyl vs. cd. If you think digital is superior then that's great. As long as everyone is enjoying the music that is all that matters.

Here is the article:

"BESET by digital piracy and increasing customer reluctance to pay for CDs, the music industry is fighting back with its latest technology – black vinyl records.

Music labels and high street retailers are busy turning back the industry’s clock to a time not only before internet song downloads, but also before CDs or even audio cassettes. The irony is that the vinyl revolution is being led by teenage consumers who are prepared to stand in line for the latest 45 rpm single or 331/3rpm LP (long-playing record) in much the same way that their parents, or in some cases their grandparents, did.

According to Rob Campkin, the head of Music at Virgin Megastores, vinyl is now outselling CDs when it comes to the latest records.

“Up to 70% of sales of new releases are vinyl. The fans of popular new rock bands like Arctic Monkeys and The Raconteurs prefer vinyl to CD,” said Campkin. “When the Raconteurs’ latest single was released, 80% of high-street sales were for seven-inch vinyl and only 20% were for CDs.”

“We are not just talking about vinyl singles but also about albums – the format is just continuing to grow,” said HMV spokesman Gennaro Castaldo.

The trend is born out by figures from record industry body, the British Phonographic Industry (BPI). According to the BPI’s findings, vinyl records are a technology that has come back from the brink of extinction to take the industry by storm. Between 2001 and 2005, annual sales of vinyl single in the UK rose sixfold to over 1m, accounting for 14.7% of all physical singles sales in 2005, up from 12.2% in 2004. The industry expects vinyl figures for the current year to be even more dramatic.

The vinyl revolution has caught many of the big music labels napping. It is the smaller independent labels who have been able to snap up successful new bands. This has left big players in the industry, such as EMI, scratching their heads and wondering why teenagers are embracing a technology the music industry had dismissed as outdated and obsolete before most of them were born.

Record labels like EMI are finding themselves losing the next generation of music stars to upstart labels like Domino Records, which handles hit bands Franz Ferdinand and Arctic Monkeys, and Rough Trade, which handles The Strokes and rock music’s latest human disaster area, Pete Doherty.

According to Virgin’s Campkin, the smaller independents have one key advantage over the larger labels as far as the artists are concerned.

“The independent labels will release material on vinyl where the more established are more reluctant to do this,” said Campkin.

One reason for this situation is believed to be that the mainstream music industry has forsaken vinyl to the extent that there is now no big vinyl processing plant in the UK. This means that the discs must be pressed offshore and that a large number of new vinyl recordings are limited editions that quickly become collectors’ items. This type of operation, where limited pressings are carried out by factories in other countries, is better suited to the independent labels than to the more established players.

Virgin also reports a trend where fans will buy the CD when it is released and will wait weeks or months until the vinyl release before buying that as well. Some vinyl albums, such as the last White Stripes release, continue to sell consistently for months.

In addition to the new releases, retailers Virgin and HMV report a growing demand for classic pop records on vinyl from artists such as The Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan. Market research has shown that these new releases of older material are often being bought by younger customers, just as older “baby boomers” are increasingly augmenting their collections with LPs from modern artists such as the White Stripes.

“The original baby boomers, who are now in their fifties, are not only buying classic pop records by the Beatles or the Stones but are also adding new artists from the independent labels to their collections,’ said HMV’s Castaldo.

According to Virgin’s Campkin, one major reason for the renewed popularity of vinyl is its collectability, which operates on two levels. On one level, collectability means seeing the value of a 99 pence (E1.43, $1.73) single CD increases 50-fold in a single year.

“The first 7-inch single release from Arctic Monkeys, which came out a year ago, is now selling on eBay for £50-£60,” said Campkin.

He added that the second sort of collectability is the desire to own a record collection of one’s own.

“Vinyl is far more iconic in this respect,” said Campkin. “The record sleeve offers the consumer art work as well as information about the performers and song lyrics.”

Some well-known music figures believe that the industry did itself irreparable damage when it switched to CDs 20 years ago.

Roger Daltrey, lead singer of 1960s supergroup The Who, said in a recent interview: “The record labels sold everybody a white elephant with the CD. They pushed it over as being this wonderful musical formula that you can play forever that sounds better and is scratch proof. None of it was true; CDs do not sound as good as vinyl and they last for five minutes.”

Like other artists of his generation, Daltrey believes that pop music generally sounds better on vinyl as so much of it was originally developed to be played on the vinyl format rather than on digital equipment. Vinyl enthusiasts say that the bass and vocals on most songs cannot be accurately reproduced on a compressed digital format and that the music inevitably loses something by being reduced to what is essentially just a binary computer code.

Daltrey also believes that record sleeves are a key part of the attraction of vinyl.

“We threw away an art form that was so much more than the record,” said Daltrey. “The size of the cover was perfect for art work. Sometimes the covers were more important than the music. The more fingerprints you got on it, the more it was a part of you. With a CD, you start with a nice plastic box and end with a scratched plastic box; it has no character whatsoever.”

Campkin said: “I think the record sleeve is paramount. With a vinyl album you feel you have spent £10-£15 on something tangible that will last.”

Daltrey also believes that it was the switch to CDs that ultimately led to the music labels’ horrendous problems with digital music piracy.

“The problem with the CD is that if you can copy what is on it for nothing, as you now can, why would you want to buy it?”

Music retailers such as Virgin and HMV are also coming to the conclusion that consumers want a return to a more tangible format. They fear that the logical conclusion to the evolution of digital music is a world without high street music retailers where fans do everything over the internet and download all their music via a PC.

Virgin plans to opens a new 25,000 square-foot Virgin Megastore in Manchester’s Arndale shopping centre that it hopes will transform the way consumers perceive record stores. More space than ever will be dedicated to vinyl records and customers will have access to turntable and

listening booths in the same way that teenagers did in the 1950s and 1960s. The store will also offer “chill-out” areas with armchairs and sofas where customers can relax and listen to music.

Virgin plans to use the same formula in other stores in the hope that it will be able to persuade teenagers to see the megastores as social venues as much as music shops. The company hopes that the strategy will enable it to offer consumers enough added value to head off growing competition from cut-price supermarket CD offers and internet download services.

The music retailers do not believe that vinyl will ever entirely replace digital music formats. Instead, they predict that the same fans will often subscribe to both formats by downloading music for their MP3 players and PCs but will also wait for the vinyl release to add that to their permanent record collections.

Virgin believes that digital music downloads may not be as big a phenomenon as some the industry anticipates and will account for no more than 10% of the overall market by 2009 and that the appeal of vinyl will continue to grow to shoppers who want to take home something tangible and lasting.

Those industry players which do not become part of the vinyl revolution will see their market share decline as smaller nimbler players snap up the new artists and establish brand loyalty with an increasingly vinyl-hungry record buying public."

Back to top
nrostov
Okay, so teens are buying vinyl. My daughter did this same thing two years ago. She went to a "cool" section of town and picked up some lps. I set up a tt for her and she was cool, she was in heaven for a month or so. Where are those lps now? In the back of her closet. The music is truly in her blood but let's not forget how fickle trend chasing teens are. She still listens to some of that music, but through her ipod. Just my observation.
Kthomas,

Before I got my record player I used to listen to songs, now I listen to albums(It's not so easy to skip songs on lp).

Justin
I think that the idea that only those who use LPs actually appreciate the music, and, as a corollary, listening to LPs makes you a music expert, is absurd. As has been mentioned before, some world renowned musicians use very pedestrian audio equipment.

My experience with LPs has been that their various problems detracted from my enjoyment of music. This was true before CDs were invented. I have always been troubled by surface noise during quiet passages. I often had to get up halfway through a side and clean up a dust ball on the stylus. Even if that didn't happen I had to get up halfway through a symphony and flip the record.

I am not bashing vinyl which under ideal conditions and with substantial investment in equipment can sound great. But I do not live in a world of ideal conditions. Were it not for CDs I might no longer listen to music at all.
Eldartford,

Were you replying to me specifically??? I was talking about my individual experience. When I used to listen to CD's all of the time I would just play the tracks I liked and I skipped the rest. This was true about 80% of the time. Vinyl forces me to listen to the whole album. However this is just me. I am in no way trying to make this a blanket statement for everyone.

Whatever way people appreciate music I am all for that. I have a friend who listens to classical music on his IPOD. That would never work for me. Does that mean his way of listening is inferior? Certainly not! He is taking time to appreciate beautiful music and that's the most important thing.
Great points by Eldartford and KThomas. I think the point isn't that the only way to sit and listen to music is via vinyl, but that if you are listening to vinyl, it requires you to pay more attention to it. Some of the young people I know listen to music constantly, but it seems to be as a sound track to their lives. I get the impression that they are not listening attentively to it, but rather are using it to create a mood for whatever else they are doing. I don't think this is wrong, but it is a different experience than listening to the music as a primary activity. When music becomes a more labor intensive activity by playing records (you have to do something at least every 20 minutes, and you have to be near a big, non-portable machine), it does force you to pay more attention (or, like Timrhu's daughter, give up).
However, once you've gotten in the habit of listening attentively, there's nothing wrong with making it convenient. I think this greatly enhances the enjoyment of music. Being able to skip songs I don't like, being able to backtrack and listen to an interesting section over adds greatly to the ability to pay attention to the music.
More to discover