Why has audio become so specilized over the years?


I got involved in audio in 1971 when I bought my first system: Sherwood 7100 receiver (there was no remotes to my knowledge yet for receivers); Garrard SL95B turntable with some level of Shure cartridge. A pair of Rectilinear 11 bookshelf speakers.. I was given 30 ft of free zip cord speaker wire the by the audio dealer

There was no IEC input on the receiver or even a perceived need to acquire a better PC. I used a dipole antenna for FM reception, and placed the turntable on a floor to ceiling open shelf system, and one speaker on each side of the wall with an entry door to the livingroom. It sounded good and provided satisfying music Six months later, I added a Dynaco Quad adapter box, and a pair of Avid speakers for the back channels to experience surround sound.....Primitive by today's standards of specialized after market upgrades

Granted, today audio systems's provide greater fidelity of sound, and operational flexibility. Think about it. Most if not all members of AG have either quality separates or a quality integrated amp. Many have replaced standard PC's with medium to expensive ones. Speaker wire is no longer zip cord, or even Home Depot 12 gauge cable, but one brand of a variety of speaker cables boosting state of the art materials, and esoteric outer coverings to eliminate signal loss and RF contamination.

(Some).....turntables, which have made a comeback in recent years, offer an outboarded motors and power supplies. Plinth materials are exotic to insure good to excellent isolation from vibration. Tonearm and TT compatibility has been elevated to a science, and equally, cartridge and tone arm interfacing is crucial.....no more guessing or working from outdated calculations....

20 years ago, (even as short as 10 years ago) built-in phono stages were a given in both pre-amps and most integrated amps. Today, the better pre-amps are line stages requiring a outboarded phono box or phono pre-amp, (or optional uninstalled MM/MC phono cards) often with the option of a separate supply

Though not a frantic trend yet, monoblock amps are often the preferred choice of amplification of some audiofiles; however, one box stereo dual mono amps lead the market. Lastly, the advent of the miraculous one box CD player, has now been given way to outboarded DAC's and separate transport

Without speculating too deeply on these developments, there is one given that is irrefutable, after market product specialization has created a total separate audio market which is typical of and necessary for a healthy for capitalist economy.....the law of supply and demand, and new markets

Against this modest introduction, I would like to get opinion and comments from members, (especially members with large and elaborate systems) as to how much more specialized will/can audio become??? And will future changes occur for reasons of user operational efficiency and comfort, or for the continual improvement in music reproduction. Consider the growing and obsessive movement taking place regarding "music sourcing", that is, music provided from uncompressed computer music files, various Music Server Services, and Music Server Organizers, like Soloose, and other similar products. Maybe, like the predictions of the end of history in the 1980's, we are about to experience the "END OF (TRADTIONAL) AUDIO"

PS, I am beginning to hate my own modest assortment of outboarded boxes and specialized speaker and IC cables....However, they can usually provide beautiful music depending on my mood and the the barometric pressure exerted on the eardrum which affects how we hear. Thanks, Jim
sunnyjim
I believe quite a bit of this has been brought on by ourselves. It used to be all about fidelity. Being able to reproduce what was recorded. It has gotten away from that. Now people want to have their systems to sound a certain way without regard to whether the are faithfully reproducing the recorded material. I constantly hear people want to make their systems sound softer, more bass, more highs, more neitral and on and on. But what if the music that was originally recorded was none of these things. I guess the era of High Fidelity is gone.
I do not really see it as all that much more complex than it used to be. There have always been separates. In fact, one could say that the 70's-80's was the "down" period of hifi wherein receivers and cassette decks were hot. What has changed I think, is the high end is more costly than it used to be, but this is true in many things.
There are only two answers to this question; either complexity has increased through evolution or it was designed by God to be this way. The second is obviously correct.

Signed: Gov. Rick Perry
Sunnyjim, I remember very old big furniture pieces with built in TV, TT, Receiver and sometimes even speakers. It was difficult to place, to upgrade and to repair. Repair was possible only at home. Today, we got smarter and have very flexible systems that can be tuned to our needs. If your room is larger you buy more powerful amp and larger speakers but use the same preamp. Why to pay for TT preamp if you don't have TT - that would be silly? If your amp or preamp plays better with different power cord - you can replace it. Do you like flexibility of a server more than simplicity of CDP? - you have a choice. I can listen to HDTV and DVD thru my DAC. I don't use preamp since I have DAC with volume control and no analog sources while other people have analog sources only and no DAC. It is all smarter and more flexible - we live in great times.
mass market goods have improved, quality and featurewise, to leave specialist a need to truly be specialized. Remember, the world of 'chips', mass production leave little for the specialist to add.