Amp experience


I have no dout that more power is better. But for low volume listening when the power output is UNDER 1 W how much difference can you tell between a 200 W SS to a same brand 300-450W SS Amps? I just like to hear from people who actually owned both amps please. Not by “ obviously” or guessing please.
kfz03110

Showing 3 responses by kosst_amojan

Unfortunately ratios aren't how logarithmic scales work and it's deceptive to frame the explanation in such a way. 

I typically listen at an average power level less than 3 watts. That gets me up into the 85-90dB region at my chair pretty easily. 6dB is perceived as a doubling in volume. The 60 watt class A envelope allows for 13dB of headroom beyond that. It'll drive 120 watts in class AB, but that doubling of power is only buying another 3dB. 400 watts? That's over 111dB. That's extremely loud even for transient peaks. That will damage hearing quickly. I personally have no desire to own an amp with that capability. It's pointless, but beyond that, it's becomes more technically challenging to build an amp that performs excellently at both 2 watts and 400. I'd much rather have 2 or 3 truly excellent watts than 400 dangerous, very seldom uses watts. But, if you're using very inefficient speakers with ugly impedance characteristics, you'll need that kind of power. Maybe more. 
My point was that very few people use anything like 20 watts. Average volume at average distance from average sensitivity speakers required more like 2 or 3 watts. I honestly don't know why people think they need 400+ watts unless they're driving very difficult speakers and/or filling a huge volume of space. 
Yeah..... That's the typical claim.... Like nothing else even comes close..... Which is demonstable false.