DCS P8i Vs. EMM CDSD/CC2

Dude you have three! threads asking the exact same question, tone it down. Don't you think one thread is probably sufficient?

At this level it is a personnel decision, you listen you decide.

I did hear them side-by-side even though I was auditioning amps at the time. The DCS was only played for about half a track since the dealer realized that I was using the EMM front end gear. So, the only characteristic that I noticed in that short period of time was that the DCS sounded more detailed. I don't think that is new info from other threads though and associated gear and personal preference determine whether it is considered as too much detail.

I also heard the 2 briefly but in my own system. In the brief and by no means exhaustive comparison the EMM seemed to have very detailed, rich harmonics and texturing with particular edge given to the highs and transparency in comparison to the DCS. The DCS seemed to excel in image density, where it was analog like and very real sounding, with a center of the earth solidity. Bass and dynamics also were quite impressive. I didn't have a chance to play around with the DCS' different digital filters. In my mind at the time and for what I was looking for the EMM took the nod, but on another day and with a slightly different system balance and requirements, or even mood that result may have been different.

I listened to the P8i and EMM combo a few months ago. Both were played through Wilson Audio Maxx 2, but the dCS went directly to the speakers by-passing the preamp. I must say that I liked the P8i more. The soundstage was better and the sound was warmer. I listened to both vocal and orchestral music, spending a total of almost two hours listening to the two. While the EMM combo had more details, the dCS was more lifelike. In fact I went to the audition almost decided on the EMM combo, but left with an indecision, primarily because so many good things have been said about the Meitner.