Have you Heard MONK at the IT club on Mosaic LP?


The recent vinyl remaster and reissue of the Thelonious Monk Quartet at the "IT" club presents some interesting audio peculiarities...in the re-recording and remastering of the original live tapes for this box set the tenor saxophone of Charlie Rouse was found to be off mic and back in the original mix CBS/Sony used for their LP and CD releases.I have the cd and Rouse is back and off mic,one hears that and lives with it as a live music imperfection.If you listen to a lot of live recordings you value the integrity of the performance more than the actual recorded sound. When Mosaic went to remaster these tapes it appears they isolated the actual track the tenor saxophone appears on and "brought it up" in the mix of the recording.
As well as the increased volume of the saxophone there is a constant thumping,on the beat,in my mind it is the foot of Monk,keeping time.Having had the pleasure of seeing Monk at least three times,and sitting very close to the piano,i could not help but notice his foot going crazy.
The "IT" club probably had a wooden stage and this foot pounding must have been picked up by one or two of the recording microphones.And there it is on the records on this set,thump thump thump.... Have you heard this,any comments? Great music by a great band! Thump thump thump...
jazzcourier

Showing 2 responses by grimace

The book is REALLY good. Strongly suggested reading. The IT Club dates are good, but - like the Rouse lineup in general - not Monk's peak performance. Some of it sounds stale, like they're just playing through it. Give me the 40s Blue Notes and the 50s Riversides and Prestiges any day.
The Black Lion's are excellent - at least after they trimmed his finger nails so you couldn't hear them on the keys.

I don't think its naive to suggest that the Rouse lineup got stale. A lot of the playing reflects that. There is plenty of video of that era when the band looks like they are falling asleep.

I have the CD version of the IT Club recordings and the performance is uneven, with the second disc sounding far more energetic that the first, which approaches somnambulant in places - as though they're having trouble getting on the same page.

That the music is excellent - and it is - is, IMHO a testiment to how truely outstanding those earlier recordings were.

Naive would be to suggest that all of the performances are uniformly outstanding. No artist has that kind of track record.