If bi-amping is so great, why do some high end speakers not support it?


I’m sure a number of you have much more technical knowledge than I. so I’m wondering: a lot of people stress the value of bi-amping. My speakers (B&W CM9, and Monitor Audio PL100II) both offer the option. I use it on the Monitors, and I think it helps.

But I’ve noticed many speakers upward of $5k, and some more than $50k (e.g., some of Magico) aren’t set up for it.

Am I missing something? Or is this just one of the issues on which there are very different opinions with no way to settle the disagreement?

Thanks folks…


rsgottlieb

Showing 1 response by co_jones

Different application, but many moons ago I used tri-amped PA systems. In Hi-Fi I have no experience other than the use of passive X-overs. I do have a couple of questions for the group since I’m considering some modifications to my system along these lines.
Isn’t the use of active sub-woofers bi-amping?
I have tube amps, are people still using passive sub-woofers vs. powered ones, e.g. class-d?
No one mentioned the quality of the active X-over. There has to be a wide range in quality.
Like wise there was no mention of tri-amping. Wouldn’t leaving a passive X-over between the mid and high drivers and actively feeding the bass really be a hybrid?