Keeping Spend Among System Proportional?


Can I assume that most folks keep the spend amongst components and accessories proportional or, in line between the entire system?

For example, here's how I spread my budget:

Amp $2k
(integrated w/Phono)
TT $3k
(arm direct wired)
Cartridge $600
Speakers $1000
Speaker Cables TBD

Has anyone ever thought they had a component that punches out of their weight class and felt justified in spending out of proportion?

For example has anyone spent more on their cart than their TT? Spent more on their speaker cables than their speakers? More on their arm than their TT? etc.

Curious to hear about some of those examples.

I may have the budget to reasonably spend around $800 on speaker cables but, feel compelled to keep in the $300 range.

Thoughts?
pawlowski6132

Showing 2 responses by viridian

I think that there is a fault in the logic of these questions. No component punches above it’s weight IMHO. But some are much more accomplished in the context of sympathetic components. System matching will be much more important than any dollar allotment by category. That kind of thinking is a recipe for disaster IMHO.

More modest, but well matched, components will always sound better than more ambitious components selected based on ratings or dollar amounts.

Although “source first” is less important than it once was, I still adhere to this and my turntable/cartridge probably has a value four times that of my other components combined, but I don’t generally suggest this type of thing. Buy components that are known to work well in combination and buy the most durable of those that you can. 
“But practically speaking does it make sense....”, ...

You did not clearly read my post, or you would understand that monetary value has no relationship to what will sound good, or be appropriate, in your system. IMHO. No problem with those that disagree BTW.