Merlin TSM comparisons


Hi,

I've been reading up lately on all kinds of monitors, and have been intrigued by Merlin's TSM. The latest iteration is the mmi, I believe.

If you've heard the TSM lately, especially in comparison to other, current monitor offerings out there, I'd love to hear your opinions. I know that there are other Merlin threads on Audiogon but I am especially interested in hearing from folks who have compared them to others, especially if you've lived with them.
rebbi

Showing 9 responses by tvad

08-23-10: Mapman
OK, but not meeting listener expectations does not mean the fundamental design of the speaker is flawed, only that the buyer chose the wrong speaker.
Generally, I agree. However, I believe a thin sounding monitor speaker is one that is fundamentally badly designed. There's no excuse for a high end loudspeaker to sound thin, IMO.

One cannot judge monitor loudspeakers using full range loudspeakers as a baseline. It's an apples to oranges comparison.

If one wants full range reproduction, then one must buy a full range loudspeaker, and again, there are plenty of full range loudspeakers (including some with well integrated, built-in subwoofers) that do not require separate subwoofers.
04-24-10: Rebbi
I think that the LSA1 Statement deserves a serious look by anybody looking at monitors in the under $3K range. Very, very musical, detailed yet non fatiguing, sweet top end from that ribbon tweeter, precise imaging, huge soundstage and remarkable bass extension. Mine are not nearly broken in yet, but I'm loving them! :-)
Posted by rebbi (A) on May 09, 2010 at 11:55:58
Hi,
On the strength of everything I've read about the Merlin TSM mini-monitor, I ordered a pair last week. I've read extensively here from a number of Merlin threads, but was wondering if any of you have heard the latest iteration, the TSM-mmi? No local dealers in Texas, so mine are on order from Merlin, and I should have them in about 5 weeks. Can't wait!

What happened to the LSA1 Statement love affair?
Maybe you should ask Tvad how many speakers he has owned and also auditioned but not kept....
Finsup (Answers)
That's fair.

1) Aerial Acoustics 7B - Bought them as my first foray into high end audio after reading Stereophile's Recommended Components list, and hearing them at a local dealership. Once I got them home, I hated them. I learned quickly to ignore Stereophile's Recommended Components list. They were sold within six months.

2) VonSchweikert VR4 Gen III HSE - Bought them on the recommendation of member "Lrsky". I loved them. Owned them for about three years until my employment situation got a little tight, and I sold the entire system to buy something less costly.

3) LSA Group LSA1 Standard - Auditioned them for a couple of weeks while I owned the VR4 Gen III HSE speakers. Liked them. Appreciated them for what they were, but ultimately favored the VR4 Gen III HSE.

4) Ohm Walsh 200 MK II with the latest Walsh drivers - Had a bad experience with Ohm. Long production delay, poor workmanship, and ultimately a blown Walsh driver within the first 30 minutes of playing them. I returned them for a refund.

5) Castle Howard S2 - Loved these speakers driven by a Leben CS600. Had some issues with these drivers as well, and returned them for a refund after personally replacing three bad drivers. It was a discontinued model, and the speakers although "new" were many years old. An unfortunate experience with a speaker I liked.

6) Silverline Sonata III - Bought these after extensive research and on the advice of an audiophile whose tastes I respect. The speakers were excellent once I found amplification that drove them to my satisfaction. Owned them for about two years until I decided they had a couple niggling sonic issues that I could not ameliorate with set-up, electronics, or cabling.

7) Audio Note AN-E SPe HE - Bought these when I made a decision to go to a higher sensitivity speaker that could be driven by low powered tube amplification. I heard them at several audio shows, and spent a good amount of time listening to them at RMAF 2009. They are my favorite speakers to date. I loved the VR4 Gen III HSE, but I love the Audio Note speakers more. They fit my room better from a sonic perspective. They "disappear", and they create a wide and large stereo image that goes wall-to-wall. My journey with them is still in progress as I zero in on my preferred amplification.

That's the 7 year journey.
What's pertinent to this thread is the model TSM that Rebbi purchased, which he hasn't mentioned. Any discussion/debate about TSM models is wasted bandwidth until he specifies what he bought.
Maybe should have discussed set-up constraints with Bobby P. before buying them...
06-26-10: Rebbi
Hooray,

Finally got my TSM-mmi's from Merlin on Monday of this week.
It's been over two months without any comment about the TSM-MMi speakers...what's the scoop?
08-23-10: Guppy
I can't see a sub solving the problem of a thin sounding speaker...
I agree. Using a sub seems like a band-aid to me.

Better to find a speaker that suits your preferences. There are plenty of speakers that do not sound thin.

08-23-10: Mapman
I don't view a sub as a band aid. That infers it fixes something that is damaged or defective otherwise.
Right. If a speaker sounds thin, then to me that's a sign of something being wrong with the speaker...even if *wrong* means the speaker doesn't meet the listener's requirements.

As I wrote, there are plenty of monitor loudspeakers that don't sound thin: Totem, Merlin, LSA, etc.
Rebbi, I'm looking into my audio crystal ball, and I see Merlin VSM speakers in your home by June.