Passive Preamps

Different flavors...and there is no right or wrong. Even in the same topology, there are differences in presentation.

The equipment simply must be heard to make any judgments. Reading about it only provides a sketch framework.

10-04-09: Milpai
One more point I would like to add is that in case of TVC the amp's input sensitivity is VERY important.

Good point.

Also, the output impedance of the source component should also be low to ensure extended and defined bass. I find below 200 ohms is optimal in my system

Many tube output sources do not qualify. Something to keep in mind when considering a passive preamp.

By the Kevin Bacon theory I'm now 1 against 3.
Tholt (Threads | Answers)

Tholt, not necessarily.

Lrsky votes for an active preamp. I give props to Lrsky's recommendations.

Yet, I own a passive preamp (SMc Audio VRE-1).

However from a perspective that seeks accurate audio reproduction there is no question that active amps are better.
Shadorne (System | Reviews | Threads | Answers)

I would like to hear a debate between you and Steve McCormack on this issue.

Tholt, my point was that you are not necessarily 1 against 3. I think Lrsky
knows what he's talking about when it comes to audio, yet I don't presently
subscribe to his general recommendation of an active preamp over a passive
preamp, and I was using my situation to explain why this is so.

I thought my post was supportive of your use of a passive, but perhaps I
misunderstood something in your string of posts.

Guys, I'm not one who believes there is a uniformly best anything for any
particular situation. There are always trade-offs to a design, and there are far
too many differences among listener preferences.

I will agree that an active preamp provides easier integration into a wider variety
of systems due to impedance matching and amplifier sensitivity, and in my
experience, not that it means a damn thing, an active preamp has usually
provided a larger "jump" factor to the music. Now, whether this
"jump" factor is faithful to the recording is another matter, but it's
not always a priority to some listeners.

10-10-09: Shadorne
Tvad,

I was qualifying my comment from a 'measurements' perspective
(reproducing a signal) -

I understand. My comment to you had nothing to do with personal
preference.

As designer of audiophile equipment, I am fairly certain Steve McCormack
measures his components on the test bench.

A debate between you two on the topic would be entertaining.