Everyone is entitled to there opinion but after owning the 3A Signatures for years and comparing them to speaker after speaker, I can say without a doubt, they are one of the better speakers available at any price for reproducing mass strings (realistically.)In fact, this is one of the time and phase designs biggest attribute.
"Old" vs. "new" digital equipment
Some recent posts about how far digital has come have got me thinking. I have a Theta DS Pro Gen III dac fed by a CEC TL5100Z as a transport. (The rest of the system is ARC LS2B Mk II into ARC VT-100 Mk II into Vandy 3a Sigs and 2WQ sub.)
I wonder what improvements I might hear if I were to go to a newer dac or newer cdp. In my current system, I hear grain when I listen to massed strings, some congestion on orchestral peaks, but otherwise most generally like what I hear.
Would newer digital stuff mitigate or eliminate these issues?
If I were to upgrade, where might I head next?
More generally, can anyone characterize the differences between my "old" Theta and newer digital equipment?
TIA.
David
I wonder what improvements I might hear if I were to go to a newer dac or newer cdp. In my current system, I hear grain when I listen to massed strings, some congestion on orchestral peaks, but otherwise most generally like what I hear.
Would newer digital stuff mitigate or eliminate these issues?
If I were to upgrade, where might I head next?
More generally, can anyone characterize the differences between my "old" Theta and newer digital equipment?
TIA.
David
- ...
- 25 posts total
- 25 posts total