Rodman99999
Nonsense.
When someone makes claims with the implication that there is actually something physical behind it, I don't need to have "heard it" or "tried it" to have a valid opinion on the matter, nor would my having "heard it" or "tried it" bring anything new to the table.
So where are those who know so much more? Who might be able to actually expand our knowledge on the issue? They seem to be conspicuously absent.
How about you?
Obviously you would have to know so much more in order to rightfully claim that I know so little.
What enlightenment and expansion of our knowledge do you have to offer on the subject?
No, it's not.
Phase is a relative term, relating to one or more waveforms with respect to time. The issue at hand has nothing to do with time. It's about compression versus rarefaction, or positive versus negative. It is decidedly an issue of polarity, not of phase.
The proper term is "absolute polarity," not "absolute phase." It was first coined by Clark Johnsen in his 1988 book, The Wood Effect. It has since been perverted into "absolute phase" by those who don't know what they're talking about.
The point of trying? If you haven't heard it, or tried it, YOU HAVE NO OPINION.
Nonsense.
When someone makes claims with the implication that there is actually something physical behind it, I don't need to have "heard it" or "tried it" to have a valid opinion on the matter, nor would my having "heard it" or "tried it" bring anything new to the table.
It's amazing how so many, that know so little, find so much to type about.
So where are those who know so much more? Who might be able to actually expand our knowledge on the issue? They seem to be conspicuously absent.
How about you?
Obviously you would have to know so much more in order to rightfully claim that I know so little.
What enlightenment and expansion of our knowledge do you have to offer on the subject?
OH- and FYI, "absolute phase" is also a correct term: (www.omegamikro)
No, it's not.
Phase is a relative term, relating to one or more waveforms with respect to time. The issue at hand has nothing to do with time. It's about compression versus rarefaction, or positive versus negative. It is decidedly an issue of polarity, not of phase.
The proper term is "absolute polarity," not "absolute phase." It was first coined by Clark Johnsen in his 1988 book, The Wood Effect. It has since been perverted into "absolute phase" by those who don't know what they're talking about.